High Court Karnataka High Court

Dilip S/O Madhukar Rao Gundnoor, vs The State, Thr Market Ps, Bidar, on 11 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Dilip S/O Madhukar Rao Gundnoor, vs The State, Thr Market Ps, Bidar, on 11 March, 2009
Author: K.Ramanna
¥N THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA»
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA  

DATED THIS THE 1 1TH DAY 01:' :»(:A_:§(:i~:_;;- 
BEFORE ' V V ' '
THE HOWBLE MiK5=,3JUS*Fl'§RAMZ%;NN_A"=
CRL.I~". No. 856__ 1_;_g)F 2&9  3
BETWEEN: 'V V V' M M
SRLDILIP, 4 ._ % _ V  
3/0 MADI~iUKAR'F*A,O e;ufp:qoe:e.,,u  _
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS-,1 1' ~  
RESIDENTOF D;EC§LG§)R; 

     . ...PE'I'IT§ONEZR.

  K'  ADV.)

ANI33 *

1 'TEE sTz3mf:§7mR:«3uGH

 I~;1AR1<§:T P.S.""B'IDAR.  RESPONDENT.

_ {E§ S.ii.SEARANABASAPPA K.BABASHET’i’Y, HCGP}
asjivcwate for the petitioner praying that this Hon’b1e Court
..may be pleased to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in

x I police station, which is nzgistcrcci for the ofiénces punishable
under Sectian 347 of E. C.Act I955.

« (3rI.P. filed under Section 438 cf Cr. RC. by the

C::::–‘.No.69/2008 in the event of his arrest by the rcsspondent

This petiiiion is coming on for orders, this day, the
Court made the following:

3;

0 R. D E R.

The petitioner has come up with
Section 438 Cr.P.(Z’. seeking for
Crime No.69] 2098 of Mark:;t}x51ie¢,aiieg§«i__
the ofiences punishalile flies
Essential Commoditiesi 1 ” V V’ i M V

2. Admittedgf, he Vigqiiagistaered in the
aft:-msaid crime on the cximplaint of
compiagnagmg V_’t:1i’a’L:x}:it’: seized 100 quintal of
Whcgzt’ :’p1_1biip::«’V_’d’isiiiiiufion which was being

._b’cai’ing Regn. No. AP 23 V 1299. The

pétit:ioi3.¢rV”‘is .”‘p144oVp1ietor of Janhavi Enterprises. The

‘.”a}.iegati<"m._ V1'fiad<§ against the petitioner is that he was

the wheat meant for public distribution. Of

were eye witness to the afleged seizure and the

have aiready filed charge; sheet in the matter.

3. According, to petitioner he purchased the entire

food gmins under valici licence from the market yard and

that he had ali the dc>r:m:uents pcrtaiiiing to the vehicle and

J .

,_e .’1’he shall mark his attendance before the

A will be for a limited period of {me month, if

; W JUDGE

the goods eoncemed. Petitiorxer has producecl Court
copies of some receipts before this court he
purchased the said fooci grains .1: «
C011si<:ie;ring the offence aflegedieagainet {Eye f
View of the facts and cixtuzeetanees '(If theguust
proper to allow this anticipefi2r__§' bail

4. Acco:ding:;;§,’~~x1us bail pamon filed by
the petitioner is aflowedj ‘V » ‘
i. The “‘vxe:’:%)e)ndc.1jfijF’a>_1iL%e ‘lie V_=:iireeted to release the
petifiejuer im ‘ the’ event of his arrest in
V_§}r.’N.();i3§?:_,!v_;2VVOO{)’ .__o£ ‘ «Market Police, Bidar on his
‘ exec1:.%t_iI1g1”;a’ pereonai 13031:! for Rs.25,000/ — with two
s<}1vefi't.31;1t1?1;ie':*s__ for the fikesum to the satisfaction of
' _ A aaxesiijng «
ii. _ IeIe"sha§3 with the prosecution witnesses.

V’MarJget police, Bidet, once in a week i.e., every tifiunday

-V iaeiweezit. 10.00 am to 12.00 noon until the trial is

the respondent police fail to arrest the petitioner
” _ that gaerioti, he shall appear before trial court
” and apply for regular bail

Sd/–