High Court Kerala High Court

Gopalan Nair vs Madhusoodhanan Nair on 11 March, 2009

Kerala High Court
Gopalan Nair vs Madhusoodhanan Nair on 11 March, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 7704 of 2009(O)


1. GOPALAN NAIR, S/O. MADHAVI AMMA,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. MADHUSOODHANAN NAIR, S/O. PADMANABHA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.P.SHINOD

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :11/03/2009

 O R D E R
                                K.T.SANKARAN, J.
                   ------------------------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C) NO. 7704 OF 2009 O
                   ------------------------------------------------------
                      Dated this the 11th March, 2009


                                     JUDGMENT

The only prayer made by the petitioner is to issue a direction to the

Sub Court, Neyyattinkara to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3

application for stay (I.A.No.365 of 2009 in A.S.No.86 of 2004). Learned

counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the application for stay

was filed in February 2009, the court below has not considered the

application. The counsel submitted that the proceedings in execution are

being proceeded with.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner has even moved an application

for advancing the hearing of I.A.No.365 of 2009. Still the court below has

not considered the application. I am of the view that the court below can

be directed to consider the application for stay (Ext.P3) at the earliest,

taking into account the fact that the execution proceedings are being

proceeded with. I am not inclined to grant any interim order to keep in

abeyance the order for delivery passed in E.P.No.10 of 2008 in O.S.No.78

of 1964. It is for the lower appellate court to consider whether stay should

be granted or not. Without the lower court considering the same, it is not

proper for this Court, exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India, to stay the delivery.

W.P.(C) NO. 7704 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

The Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Sub Court,

Neyyattinkara to consider Ext.P3 application (I.A.No.365 of 2009 in

A.S.No.86 of 2004) expeditiously.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/