IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 411 of 2011(B)
1. DR.SATHEESH KUMAR.R,B.R.HOSPITAL,
... Petitioner
2. K.BABU,BHINDU BHAVAN,B.R.BUILDING,
Vs
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent
2. THE SECRETARY,PARAVOOR MUNICIPALITY,
3. THE TOWN PLANNER,DEPARTMENT OF TOWN AND
4. THE CHIEF TOWN PLANNER,GOVERNMENT OF
5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,KOLLAM.
For Petitioner :SRI.S.S.RAJESH
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR
Dated :06/01/2011
O R D E R
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
--------------------------------------------
W.P.(C). NO.411 OF 2011
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 6th day of January, 2011
JUDGMENT
The grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the inordinate delay
in the matter of disposal of Ext.P4 application dated 15.2.2010 submitted
by the petitioner for renewal of registration of the hospital belonging to
him. In view of the order I propose to pass in this Writ Petition I do not
think it necessary to issue notice to the respondents. As already noticed
hereinbefore, the grievance of the petitioner is with respect to the inaction
to dispose of Ext.P4 application submitted before the competent authority.
Considering the fact that on earlier occasions registration was renewed by
the second respondent, there cannot be any doubt with respect to the
position that the second respondent is competent to consider and pass
orders on Ext.P4 application. In the said circumstances, without making
any observations as to the merits of the contentions raised in this Writ
Petition, it is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to
consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 application, in accordance with law.
This shall be done expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month
from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)
spc
W.P.(C) NO. 2
C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
JUDGMENT
September, 2010
W.P.(C) NO. 3