High Court Kerala High Court

Muhammed Kabeer vs State Of Kerala on 6 January, 2011

Kerala High Court
Muhammed Kabeer vs State Of Kerala on 6 January, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 8855 of 2009(B)


1. MUHAMMED KABEER, S/O.KUNJARAMMU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

2. FINANCE STANDING COMMITTEE,

3. MANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.S.RAJAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :06/01/2011

 O R D E R
                            C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.
                     --------------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C). NO.8855 OF 2009
                     --------------------------------------------

                   Dated this the 6th day of January, 2011


                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner has constructed a building in Ward No.IV of

Mangalam Grama Panchayath as building No.MP/IV/313 A. Later, the

petitioner was served with Ext.P2 whereby building tax was assessed.

After effecting payment demanded as per Ext.P2, he has filed Ext.P4

appeal dated 30.4.2008 before the second respondent mainly with the

prayer to re-assess the tax and return the balance amount. The grievance

of the petitioner is that it is still pending consideration. The petitioner has

yet another grievance regarding the non-issuance of the ownership

certificate in respect of his building. It is to redress the said grievances

that this Writ Petition has been filed. Despite the receipt of notice in this

proceedings, the respondents did not care to file any counter affidavit in

this Writ Petition.

2. As noticed hereinbefore, the grievance of the petitioner

pertains to the non-disbursal of Ext.P4 appeal as also the non-issuance of

ownership certificate pursuant to Ext.P7. In the circumstances, this Writ

W.P.(C) NO.8855/2009 2

Petition is disposed of as hereunder:

The second respondent is directed to consider Ext.P4 appeal dated

30.4.2008 expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of one month from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The pendency of Ext.P4 appeal

cannot be a reason for non-consideration of the request of the petitioner for

issuance of ownership certificate especially in the light of Ext.P1. There

will be a further direction to the third respondent to consider Ext.P7

application for issuance of ownership certificate expeditiously, at any rate,

within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment. While considering Ext.P7 application, Ext.P1 shall be looked

into.

(C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)

spc

W.P.(C) NO.8855/2009 3

C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

JUDGMENT

September, 2010

W.P.(C) NO.8855/2009 4