High Court Kerala High Court

E.J.Leena vs State Of Kerala on 16 January, 2009

Kerala High Court
E.J.Leena vs State Of Kerala on 16 January, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36223 of 2005(K)


1. E.J.LEENA, SENIOR LECTURER,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS,

3. J.BEENA, ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF

4. DIRECTOR, S.C.E.R.T(STATE COUNCIL OF

5. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A&E), KERALA,

6. DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION), WAYANAD.

7. GEORGE JOSEPH, PRINCIPAL, DIET,

8. K.K.SURENDRAN, LECTURER, DIET,

9. T.V.GOPAKUMAR, LECTURER, DIET,

10. KERALA WOMEN'S COMMISSION, REPRESENTED

                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.GOPAKUMAR

                For Respondent  :SMT.PARVATHI MENON A.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :16/01/2009

 O R D E R
              T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.
                      -------------------------
                W.P ( C) No. 36223 of 2005
                     --------------------------
             Dated this the 16th January,2009

                       J U D G M E N T

Aggrieved by the order of suspension Ext.P1,the

petitioner approached this Court by filing this writ

petition. According to the petitioner, she had filed a

complaint against respondents 7 to 9 with regard to

certain matters. But the petitioner had to suffer the

order of suspension unnecessarily.

2. In the counter affidavit filed by respondents 1

to 5, it has been made clear in paragraph 13 that the

petitioner has been re-instated in service and posted as

Senior Lecturer (DIET) in Thrissur against the retirement

vacancy of one Smt.Kochuthressia. Therefore, as far the

revocation of suspension is concerned the matter has

become final.

3. The surviving grievance is regarding the non-

payment of salary. It is made clear by respondents in para

13 of the counter that since no special rules have been

W.P ( C) No. 36223 of 2005
2

framed for DIET Institutions and the appointment as

Lecturer in DIET is on provisional basis. Accordingly, the

5th respondent Accountant General (A&E) has issued

provisional pay slip to DIET staff. It is pointed out that

presumably because of the pendency of the writ petition

she was not issued pay slip as was being issued to other

staff members.

4. Therefore, the 5th respondent will take

immediate steps, at any rate, within six weeks from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment to see that the

pay slip as far as the petitioner is concerned is issued and

the 2nd and 6th respondent will see that the petitioner’s due

salary will be disbursed expeditiously .

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,
JUDGE)
ma

W.P ( C) No. 36223 of 2005
3

W.P ( C) No. 36223 of 2005
4