High Court Karnataka High Court

Indian Institute Of … vs The Secretary Coorg District … on 16 January, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Indian Institute Of … vs The Secretary Coorg District … on 16 January, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
M _,.. -...V_A....V... .." wmnnlumzflnm mun %\'UKl uh mmwmfimk iiflfifi €03.58"! 0? KARNAEAKA H36?! CQIJRT 05 mmmmm HIGH CC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ATBANGALORE

DA TED THIS THE 1 am DA Y or JANUARY_20b9 f     2 R

BEFORE

THE HOIWBLE Am..1UsT1cE SlJEHA«SH   T.  V  

I1Lr'.}9.Iv'o.6420/200;/":"!L::1*i?_!:S) . , " 

INDIAN INS'I'I'I'U'i'E' OF'1.Ht;)RTfC}ULTURAL
RESEARCH (ICAR)     
HESARAGHA'{'TA-'LAKE 
BANGAI,~ORE-~560 ow? *  
BY ITS..I)IR}*3(}T()R_GENF3R.?Ffi. .

Drs      PETITIONER

0(B§:0S'}:£:;?\S'I"I§I;V'1?i.DVOCATE )
T <;:c;aor<<3 DISTRICT GENERAL

  ' - . _ woi?1s:§',Rs' UNION

A   v11f<A,J?E:r¢;371 213  RESPONDENT

‘ ¢_:3y C NARASIMHAN AND ASSOCIATES)

0 “THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227

_ OF”‘~I.’HE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH

« AWARD PASSED BY THE CENTRAL

-v(‘zC=VVEI?NMENT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL~CUM~LABOUR

HCORT, BANGALORE, IN C.R.NO.28 OF 2000
0’ ” ” DT.12.9.2006 VIDE A.NNEXURE~G.

‘MP’°w”‘m Manna l..¥BlILbsI..um.nu.m>n».«.-. ._… —_

THIS PE’I’ITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMifiARY

HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURTF’:’M.”ADE

THE FOLLOWING:


ORDEE   A

This writ petition is   '-Elie    *

directed against the   in

C.R.No.28/ 2000 on the’:’ffle’t–_of.:_»tt1e”- Government

2. the said award has
directed” to larise the services of
the it on par with the Malis

w.e.f. AV1.,3.19493._:a11d.’*the niorkman win not be entitled for

‘dtafiegéhcessvgagestifany, from 1.3.1993 till the date of

‘gassing However, they wiil be entitled to

V all the Benefits, which are available to the Malia,

… …..,-….M.m.mw-t suwawm wmwwrua WW Mmwxmnnn iflfifl COURT OF KARNATAK& MGM move? 0% %&¥&NATfiKfi Hméfi CG?

” Lwezre. tvorking in the Management.

»’ The ease of the union was that the workmen

ttxwere treated as casual workers though they were in

service since begnning and their services have not been

regularised in the award passed in C.R.No.28/1988

mm summon msmuuwummm… V! m

.. …. …m…mmm mm LUUK! out mmmmm mew comm” at KARNATAKA mew ceum OF Kammam HIGH CC

dated 30.8.1989, the Management was directed» to

prepare a Scheme for Regularisaition of the of”

casual workers, who have completed K

service by then. It is alleged that the

not regularising their services

service benefits, the workers’-nh’ave the

benefit of the said awa.;ed.,_

4. This by the
Management,’ petitioner is not
an Industxjyzv Section of $36) of the
I.}Z).Act. ‘afirard, the second dispute

is hit by judicata and also aileged

that t1_i¢e”servicexs”eVft.heworkmen cannot be regularised.

that the workmen had no right to seek

oftheir services.

5; The Industrial ‘I’ribunal oonsidering the

:”aWaI’d observed that the second dispute raised

Union is not hit by the principles of res judicata,

as workmen have completed eight years of service and

they are seeking regularisation. It also observes that in

z'”3″”‘ c’

Mwwwva. 2:: mm.” as mm” mm. M. mam:

nwuwwioi

wm’vflVVB;I’!SQfl W ,.W…..m…~. nawn MWUHI w mxmamm z-lam-5 mam es mewmm mew men we memmm wee ec

View of the conapletion of eight years service, worlnnen

are entitled for regularisation.

6. Sri K.V.Narasimha11_, _I_eamed” ~– 1: ‘_ it it

appearing for the Union submitted’_’_’

Tribunal had directed a
Scheme for casual Jxirorkeitsii ” of
regularising their only few of the
casual workers,’ tize’ their
services whose dispute
was ::;:tjme;y have not been
completed eight years

of service. V’}§eiisu?eniitted’i}1at the second dispute is not

__. res jndicata nor the Management
./_t;hev’«i.t:i1piementation of the earlier award. It is

the Workmen have completed the
oiieiigiit years and more, they are entitled for
eisatien. It is not in dispute that the earlier

was raised by the Union on the issue, which

s .– ?

reads a under”

WMW&,wmt~.. m embamten

“Whether the following demands by the

Coorg District General Workers’ Union _4
justified? If yes, to what relief the

workmen are entitled to?

1. for regularisation -’81

temporary workmen,” (mentiioned°
A11nexuIe)appende€iww.t§ereto, A ‘ V

2. for providing other
protection thel wicflcers and

3. §;~o§iding, hiee§cs1 ram-wees of I-IESF,
. ‘ ‘ ‘

7. “In ” ‘of Point of Reference, the

_. ‘enesvard as under:–

. c
…,,,.,.V_… ..,. nmmwmaalwa men Wem as memmm men cease’ oe KARNMAKA mew WW7 0? mmemm W79″ ’75

‘ Ascheme shall be prepared by the

to regularise those employees out of
K8} in the Annexure to the order of

h’ on : reference, who have put in continuous
” sewice of eight years or more than eight
years as on 31.8.1989 and pay them the
salary and allowance with effect from the
first of the month which shall not be beyond
three months from the date on which this