Iunruu 'aspen: Ian IUl"ll'I.Iil'IIl')l\I'\l any-mu-an Vaaiuffituxu was mu-In-uI:1n:1n1.r1. nu:-nan: V-I1-rnuunn Ian I1l'II1IIrIIrIl\'--I uuuuuu -uuaurqsu nan IIp"|q\III*nll'1I\.r' liuwpll wwemnm mpg a\¢1nu1rmag-man-Q g[I\.r|| 1.1 ..1_ IE} '§'§-EE HEGH CGQRT £9? TK¥:K 33:'? E.3'~.§~}GPLi.aGRE axrsrgr: *3'!-53$ Fr:-m 19"" EA'! Ci? SEPTEMBER 2098" EEFGRE van HBR'BLE HR.JUSTICE A.s.?A5Hag3§RE'ff' RE$fihRR.?ER3T APPEAL NG.1Q3§mfif"2GQQ¥§fi$€l»L j §E'?5s'EE?§ E V EQRAIEWEHY &A1na H,', 339 E H VENKRTASVEHY §AlBfi .u MAJGR, RED 15?;1»_ ,~"-L* §E¥ TH1?FA3ANBRRu_f _ wsak FUTTAEPR Mamfingz' Efifiifihfiaafi V A '. Efifiakhflkfiefififl 093 335:3 figfigaéin B? §;g3u:1' 1.
Ex? §,a:33$%g§sfax$EaL §w:§£:
aggv A£fi§T_6Ij?EEfiS W
2 $gT.§,?u5HRA éam;mflE#i»
Aafin R£QUT 42.YEfiRS*
KY3 Efihfiffififififfihfifififiififl
.~_3 gmfi $§xgMAfi”§$ayg.
‘*.$£5§zA3$%$ 3? ?KARs
°4″”$§:=§}xRi33&a iafi
~. ,§.5.’gg R3GE._3=I’* , 32 YEARS
?§,i}”f_z §v;RE”E§1ESI33ING AT
zx2s;2.1»s’?;-‘1, Haw THFPASAHDRR
~ 533%” P€}T’?PePPA HUN
1:1 yrma
*_ER§GRLGRE-5&9 33$ ..AEPELLA§T
” st3~:*3*.m.x.mm..pm:;A, Amt. mp:
l’=§;’§ Kfifiif? a CD.)
” “‘ *A’y_j’ “‘– — -..–1.uurnu-uv-1 Iuvll Vulwuhl Ill” RRKIVHIHRR HIV” LQUKI Ur C
-2..
1 3%? Q SURYAEEEARRTHRRH
wig LRTE a A3PAaA sassy
Hflfifik, Rffi fl6.95f4?K
EEE EEK 37353
gag TH§??RSRfiERR
Efifiifikfikfikfi
Ek§$RLfiRE~§éG ass
ER} x fiAEARAJA REED? V
HRJQR, Sim Mawzawxmv Rgnnv.
fi§.1%1§, 1 fififlsfi, 1 EEEN ‘
axswaamannx maven? ”
axa 22: swass uu*. =. =-;= z
fiA§E&LORE ‘V,.RES?0fi33HTS }
Pa)
ag? ER} 3 3 vAEAfi2§3ga$.i£§v;géfia_R2>
REE :3 Fififlfl §£$’x§’_Q? “cFC4;A£A1nsT THE
saa§§3§? fififi ‘gaafifigg §A?5§_’2§,9;2ass PASEED IN
S.$.§fl.é$§5£§fl §fifTHE E353 $3 ?HE XIV AUQL. CITY
C333; Jufigg,’»3§3g3£a33′<§:3x;35:§a HE 391? FGR
Efiflhkfififilfifig ?ms$ss5:u§gas3-xaagscmzeg,
TEES E?EEAL §§aim§*sH fag HEARIHG THIS nay,
TEE Chfifi? fifihxflfifisfi THE 3QLL$W1fiG:
figgéfigxw
2
?x¢_.mn#uc§e$£f$i .§iaintiff has aggreached
= £hi$”fiéfif:uchallefiéing the fii3$i$3al af the suit
‘ia §}$;$¢,#33fif$G aeeking relief vf daclaraticn,
§a55aé$ian’§n$ injunction in rasgact cf the suit
“.,!§§ha§Ui&v7’A? graparty fiaacrihad in the achadula
“,’$$.t §5giaint.
2. Vha .facts ralavant for the purpose af
A”«”§Eis aggsai are as undar:
K
– -….- ……… ..V_y ..u w. In-1¢saunr1IrII\-l’\ uuwn wvvnu vr nnnnntnnn r3I\.’.fl1 LAJUKI UP RRKRHIHIKA HIBH LUUKI U!” RIKKNIHAKA HIGH U
“W
%, fiuriag the pendency mf this aggeal, the
3§§§iia§: has filed an aggiicatian ufa 41 Rm;é E?
SP2 asaiag garmiggicfi ta isad 3dfiitiQ§ai¥”_
evi§&n$e and tha rasgundenta have _§1$@_Vfiied3
akjestimnfi ta the said &§@ii¢§ti¢fi. ‘i§x #fi§_x
sircamstanaes, I have hearé the lpa:n§§ Eoun$$i
far aha aggellant aha alga fi§&«:é5pandeni5.7 WW’
1%. The point$~ -thgt’u afi3a for my
camzifiaratisn are: W”
: 1{ Efiefihfin the plaifitiif
is én§;tiéfi,£§ fihé igiief af
“fi¢:iara§i¢fiV §3 “”” Eégardfi the
;=«xb’;-.<«:fi;:;s='é.f3'c.'»._ ' .6'£'?n_é3:'shig at" the
3Qit $$h$§uiép§ §rcgerty?
A x*2;V¥fi§ther the glaintiff
.5'*ié,«in aéiuai pesaeaaien and
H_ a§§¢ymant af tha suit
x §flh§§#1e grcgerty?
3. Whether the glaintiff
s wag §i3po33es3ed by the
fiafandants and that whether
the glaintifif is entitled ta
tha gassassian sf tha suit
schaduia gragarty?