IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48308 of 2008
1. Gangai Kamat @ Ganagi Kamti son of Panchu Kamat.
2. Tripura Devi daughter of Gangat Kamat @ Gangai Kamti
3. Maha Dev Kamat son of Gangai Kamat @ Gangai Kamti
4. Raj Kishore Kamat son of Asharfi Kamat
5. Asharfi Kamat son of Madan Kamat
6. Yogendra Kamat son of Baidh Nath Kamat.
7. Ravindra Kamat son of Baidha Nath Kamat.
8. Lilai Kamat son of Anup Kamat
9.Bhuwar Kamat son of Lilai Kamat
10. Baidh Nath Kamat, son of Kanak Kamat.
11. Bhogendra Kamat son of Baidh Nath Kamat, all are
residents ofVillage Mangar Patti, P.S. Raj Nagar, District
Madhubani. .......Petitioners.
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Bipin Choudhary son of Sajjan Choudhary, R/o village Mangar
Patti, P.S. Raj Nagar, District Madhubani....Opposite Parties.
----------------------------------
2 18.08.2011 The present application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has
been filed for quashing the order dated 11.08.2008 passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.-V,
Madhubani, in Cri. Revision No. 260 of 2008, whereby the
learned court has dismissed the revision petition filed by the
accused petitioners affirming the cognizance order passed by the
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani on 17.02.2008 in G.R.
Case No. 562 of 2006 in which cognizance has been taken under
sections 147, 341,323, 452, 307 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.
From the perusal of the impugned order it appears
that on the basis of evidence recorded in the case diary in
paragraph1, 4,6,7,8 and 10 and the injury report of injured
Parveen Kumar , the offence has been made in which
cognizance has been taken by the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate. There is nothing in the impugned order to about the
2
misuse of the process of law and miscarriage of justice.
In the facts and circumstances of the case , I do not
find any merit in this application and the same is dismissed.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
M.Rahman