High Court Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Govind Singh Chouhan vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 21 October, 2010

Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur
Govind Singh Chouhan vs State Of Raj. & Ors on 21 October, 2010
                                                                      Item No. 80, DJ/-
                                                              SBCWP NO. 8854/2010
                                          Govind Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.
                                                           Order dt: 21st October, 2010


                                  1/2


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                            AT JODHPUR
                              ORDER

S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8854/2010
Govind Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

DATE OF ORDER :::        21st October, 2010

                            PRESENT


            HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI


Mr. Kuldeep Mathur, for the petitioner.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the communication of

adverse entry vide Annex-7 dated 17.06.2005 for the year 2003-04,

however, learned counsel for the petitioner drew Court’s attention

towards Annex-16, copy of the complete ACR made available to him

under the Right to Information Act, which shows that the superior

authority i.e. Additional Chief Engineer had already over-ruled such

adverse entry and found working of the petitioner was good.

3. It appears that impugned communication Annex-7 dated

17.06.2005 has been issued in ignorance of remarks of the superior

authority, namely, Additional Chief Engineer. However, the petitioner

does not appear to have brought into the notice of the competent

authority i.e. Head of the Department/DPC this facts.

Item No. 80, DJ/-

SBCWP NO. 8854/2010
Govind Singh Chouhan Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.

Order dt: 21st October, 2010

2/2

4. Considering the submissions advanced at bar by

learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of as

prayed by learned counsel with liberty to the petitioner file appropriate

representation to the competent authority bringing to his notice this

fact and said authority shall decide the representation of the

petitioner, preferably within a period two months from today.

5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. A copy of this
order be sent to the respondents forthwith.

(DR. VINEET KOTHARI), J.

DJ/-

80