Gujarat High Court High Court

Haribhai vs Joint on 29 July, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Haribhai vs Joint on 29 July, 2011
Author: H.K.Rathod,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/9250/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9250 of 2011
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

HARIBHAI
CHHELABHAI PATEL - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

JOINT
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION STATE OF GUJARAT,GANDHINAGAR & 3 -
Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MRDRBHATT
for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 1,3 - 4. 
Mr. Maulik
Nanavati AGP  Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/07/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned Advocate Mr. DR Bhatt for petitioner and learned AGP Mr.
Maulik Nanavati for respondents NO.1,2 and 3.

In
this petition, petitioner has challenged order dated 28th
July, 2008 page 13 Annexure D wherein request made by petitioner has
been rejected only on the ground that petitioner is not a trained
teacher having three years training, therefore, he is not entitled
for scale of Rs.1640-2900. This petition is preferred by petitioner
after a period of three years and today is one more day after
completion of three years exactly over. However, it is submitted by
learned advocate Mr. DR Bhatt for petitioner that Government
Resolution has been misinterpreted by State Government, having
different interpretation in different district.

If
that be so, let petitioner make detailed representation to
respondents no.1,2 and 3 within one month from date of receipt of
copy of present order.

As
and when such representation made by petitioner is received by
respondents, it is directed to respondents to consider it and
re-examine grievance of petitioner and then to pass appropriate
reasoned order in accordance with law/Government Resolution within
three months from date of receipt of such representation from
petitioner and then to communicate decision to petitioner
immediately thereafter.

With
these observations and directions, this petition is disposed of by
this Court without expressing any opinion on merits.

Direct
Service is permitted.

(H.K.

Rathod,J.)

Vyas

   

Top