High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Raushan Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 29 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Raushan Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 29 July, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Cr.Misc. No.22791 of 2011
                            Raushan Kumar, son of Jagdish Singh
                                            Versus
                                    The State Of Bihar
                                          -----------

2. 29.7.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offence under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the alleged stolen motorcycle was

recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and

the petitioner’s sister Gitanjali is ready to stand surety for him,

let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two

sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed

by the court concerned to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Mishra,

Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Barh, in connection with Mokama

P.S. Case No. 238 of 2010, G.R. No. 1580 of 2010 subject to

the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor

will undertake to furnish information to the court about any

change in the address of the petitioner (ii)That the bailor shall

also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if

the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature

after his release in the present case and thereafter the court
2

below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation

of bail on the ground of misuse (iii)That the petitioner will give

an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he

fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse. (iv)That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

has been implicated repeatedly at the instance of the local

police who is hostile to the petitioner and seeks protection of a

person well reputed doing social service in the area. Under the

circumstances, the petitioner will report to Mr. Kishore Kunal,

Chairman, Bihar Religious Trust Board, Bihar, Patna, within

fifteen days of his release on provisional bail for a period of six

months and file a certificate about the same in the court within

the stipulated time. In case, the petitioner fails to file certificate,

notice shall be sent to him for cancellation of bail, (ii) That once

the petitioner reports to Mr. Kunal, Mr. Kunal is requested to

evolve a method by which without affecting the petitioner’s

present vocation, if any, the petitioner can be made socially

productive so that an effort is made to bring him back in the

main stream of the society/ he is given adequate protection

and (iii) At the end of the six months, the petitioner will be
3

required to file a certificate in the court below granted by Mr.

Kishore Kunal. If the certificate granted to the petitioner is

found satisfactory, the court below will confirm the provisional

bail granted to the petitioner or else will issue notice for

cancellation of bail.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali