IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RP No. 368 of 2003()
1. HASSAN KOYA,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. KOSHY VARGHESE,
... Respondent
2. STATE OF KERALA,
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.GIRI
For Respondent :SRI.P.V.RAMA WARIAR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.RAMACHANDRAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
Dated :24/11/2006
O R D E R
M. RAMACHANDRAN & A.K.BASHEER, JJ.
----------------------------------------------
R.P.NO.368/2003 IN A.S.NO.111/1990
----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 24th day of November, 2006
O R D E R
Ramachandran, J.
The review petition is filed from the judgment passed in
A.S.No.111 of 1990. We had heard learned counsel for the review
petitioner. The ground taken up in the review petition is that the
Division Bench had erred in holding that the proviso to Section 44 of
the Sale of Goods Act would not have been applicable to the
transactions. It is further submitted that the District Collector who
had passed orders on 3.3.1986 had erred in comprehending the
issue. We do not agree with the contentions of the respondents.
Further, It would have been more appropriate for the review
petitioner to challenge the final judgment as might have been
admissible and the reliefs sought for do not come within the purview
of the application for review. Consequently, the review petition is
dismissed.
M. Ramachandran, Judge
A.K.Basheer, Judge
Mbs/
DBA NO.
:-2-:
M. RAMACHANDRAN &
A.K.BASHEER, JJ
—————————————–
–
R.P.NO. 368 OF 2003 B
——————————————
O R D E R
DATED: 24-11-2006
DBA NO.
:-3-: