High Court Jharkhand High Court

Hazara Bibi vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 19 August, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Hazara Bibi vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors. on 19 August, 2011


                                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI          

                                                     W.P.(Cr.) No.392 of 2005
   Hazara Bibi                                              …..  Petitioner 
Versus 
   State of Jharkhand & ors.                         ….. Respondents  
                                                      
                                           CORAM : HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE  
                                                                        …..   


                                          For the petitioner                       : Mr.A.K.Choudhary,Advocate
                                          For the Respondent                       : JC to G.P.­II 
                                                                                            Dated­ 19
                                                                                                      th
                                                                                                         August , 2011
                                                                                                                      

                           By Court­            This writ petition has been preferred by widow of one 

Ali   Hussain,   who   was   taken   in   custody   by   the   police   on   15th 

November, 2004 in a case instituted under Section 25(1­b)/26 of the 

Arms Act in Palajori PS Case No.122 of 2005 corresponding to G.R. 

Case No.725 of 2005.

2. The    petitioner’s  husband,  when   was  in  custody,  was  found 

dead in Hazat and was found hanging from ventilator. A Magisterial 

inquiry was also ordered and the Executive Magistrate submitted its 

report dated 17th December, 2005 indicating that in his opinion, it is 

a case of suicide; whereas the petitioner’s contention is that from the 

manner in which the petitioner’s husband was alleged to have been 

found handing, it cannot be believed that it could have been a case 

of suicide.

3.   The   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   submitted   that   it   was 

alleged that petitioner’s husband tied up one  of  the  sleeves of his 

own shirt and hanged himself from the ventilator and that itself cast 

a serious doubt, in view of the fact that a sleeve if tied in the neck of 

a   person   and   it   is   used   of   hanging   then   both   sleeves   which   are 

stitched, they are bound to fall the person down without getting the 

person tight and getting the cloth intact. Learned counsel for the petitioner 

also  drew my attention to the other  allegation   and   requested   that in  

  2.                

the   facts   and   circumstances   and   when   the   writ   petitioner   being 

widow of the deceased, who was taken into custody, has reasonable 

apprehension,  then an investigation is required to be conducted by 

an independent agency, not by the State agency, so as to find out the 

cause of death of the husband of the writ petitioner.

4. I  have also perused the earlier orders passed by this Court and 

I deem it fit and proper that without entering into the merit of the 

case in any manner, it will be appropriate that a fresh investigation 

may   be   conducted   by   the   Central   Bureau   of   Investigation   and, 

therefore,   the   State   is   directed   to   refer   the   matter   to   the   Central 

Bureau of Investigation for investigating the matter.

5. The writ petition is disposed of with the above direction.

               (   Prakash Tatia, A.C.J. )

                                                                                                       
G.Jha/