Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Hemant vs Municipal on 9 September, 2011
Author: Anant S. Dave,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/3169/2011	 1/ 1	ORDER 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 3169 of 2011
 

=================================================


 

HEMANT
SHANKARLAL GUJAR - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION FOR THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD THROUGH - Respondent(s)
 

=================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
MB GANDHI for Petitioner(s) : 1,MR CHINMAY M GANDHI for Petitioner(s)
: 1, 
MR HS MUNSHAW for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 09/09/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

This
matter was listed yesterday and was ordered to be kept today on the
request made by learned for the respondent – corporation that
learned Senior Counsel appears in this matter.

Today,
when the matter is called out, similar request is made to adjourn the
case and such request is rejected.

Having
heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the
case, it appears that in Special Civil Application No.9562 of 2001
learned advocate appearing for the respondent – corporation
stated on instructions that, upon scrutiny of the case of the
petitioner, it was found to be genuine and it was resulted that the
petitioner should be and shall be granted benefits to which he is
entitled, including regularization in service with retrospective
effect and all consequential benefits in accordance with rules of the
respondent, later on. However, the corporation has taken a different
stand and the petitioner, who has put about 24 years of service, is
without any promotion though the vacancies on the post are available.

In
view of the above, Rule returnable on 19th
October, 2011.

In
the meanwhile, the respondent authorities are directed not to
terminate the services of the petitioner.

[Anant
S. Dave, J.]

*pvv

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

75 queries in 1.643 seconds.