IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 18281 of 2010(I)
1. INDIRA BHAI, W/O.SREEKANDAN NAIR,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent
2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
3. SAJI THANKAPPAN,
4. BALAKRISHNAN, PUTHEN VEEDU,
5. ANUJI @ MANI,
For Petitioner :SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
For Respondent :SRI.T.P.PRADEEP
The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS
Dated :29/06/2010
O R D E R
K. M. JOSEPH &
M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
--------------------------------------------------
W.P(C). NO. 18281 OF 2010 I
---------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 29th June, 2010
JUDGMENT
K.M. Joseph, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the fifth
respondent is unserved. He would submit that the petitioner
does not press any relief against the fifth respondent. We record
the submission.
2. Respondents 3 and 4 filed a Counter Affidavit denying
the allegations. Learned counsel for respondents 3 and 4 would
submit that actually the son-in-law of the petitioner has issued
cheques and they were dishonoured. He would further submit
that respondents 3 and 4 have no intention to cause any threat to
the life of the petitioner. In view of the apprehension of the
petitioner, besides recording the submission of the learned
counsel for respondents 3 and 4, we direct that in case any
instance of threat on the life of the petitioner by respondents 3
WPC.18281/2010 I 2
and 4 is brought to the notice of the second respondent, the
second respondent will afford protection to the life of the
petitioner as against any threat by respondents 3 and 4. We
make it clear that we have not pronounced on the correctness of
the allegations made against the petitioner by respondents 3 and
4.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/=
K.M. JOSEPH,
JUDGE
Sd/=
M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS,
JUDGE
kbk.