High Court Karnataka High Court

Indumathi N Rao vs The Special Deputy Commissioner on 20 October, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Indumathi N Rao vs The Special Deputy Commissioner on 20 October, 2010
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar
 D  BANGALORE »« 560 001

1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AT BANGALORE 7 

Dated this the 20th day Of October, 2010- I  " 
BEFORE: T A T.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D  _ 

Writ Petition NO. 3108.1 of2o;: O";'LA-KLA29,Iéj' "  
BE EN _  _ V 7.   _

1. INDUMATI-11 N RAO 
AGED 47 YEARS    _ 
W/O LATE AA1\_IARAYANA_PAO__  "

2. D1L1PKU1\;2A';e,:VI'*   
AGED 23  ' _ __   
S/O LATE NAR'AY.ANA--

B0'"I'E4IO';LRI§;:.R/ATfE"'C/O, 

MANJ1I_NADv:A;'sOM'AYAq1 . _'

YEKKADUE, VIA. _KA1MA__RA_

UN'I'QOR}{A'ITE ?'Os*r-.__  

TPiIRTii_AHA.LLI_ TALUK 

SHIMOG;A__{)£S'i'.RIC"T.   PETITIONERS

 S K Acharya, Adv.[

1.» ' --..jmE«S'PEC1AL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
'  KIADB,"1"}7/3, 11 FLOOR
RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING
NRUEPATHUNGA ROAD

V' -- .  S}3ECI,AL LAND ACQUISITEON
OFFICER, KIADB
BYKAMPADY INDUSTREAL AREA
BYKAMPADY
MANGALORE ~w 575 001

 



   to  effect is placed before the Court,

fea,d'_i_ng " 

2

3. UDUPI POWER CORPORATION LTD.
NO.2G2, PRESTIGE OPAL
2N» FLOOR, 146.
INFANTORY ROAD
BANGALORE A 560 001
REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE   V. _   . ~ ..
DIRECTOR (TECHNICAL)     I VRE3Si?'ONDE.NT,S

THIS PE'I'£'E"ION Is FILED UNDE£i':.AR:ffIc~LEsi'226_AI\:D:}2;--2ff*OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO_::;DIREC'r; 

RESPONDENTS TO PAY THE "=REVIs'ED vAZ\ED"'V.__ENEvL5i1\TCED'A

COMPENSATION AMOUNT As PER.VVAiNNEXU’I?1a:mA.<TO ',C TO THE
PETITIONERS IN RESPECT OF____ SCHEDULE LAND Is
CONCERNED AND E'I'C.. *

THIS PETITION CONIINCA ONV§':'fjOR"'eRELIMINARY HEARING.
THIS BAY, THE COURT TNE. E'QLLOW}'I'JQ:..

Sri S Ije:er_rI'edAAICOVi;fise1 for the petitioners,
submits' to the rights of the
petitiOne1*s_tO_pur_sDe'–tfieiI'*I'emedy, if any, elsewhere. this

writ pf.'-titiion may' be dismissed as Withdrawn.

' respectfully submitted as fotlOws:–

Reserving liberty to the Petitioner to
I 'challenge the impugned inaction of the
'' "respondents, in a contempt proceedings, to be

initiated by the petitioners, the above writ

3

petition may kindly be disposed off, in
interest of justice and equity. f

3. Submission is noted. Memo received on’ “recoi1_’d.L’

4. Writ petition is dismissed as”:4mt’hdiawn.”‘ _Cf eou_r”se:,

this will not affect the exAisti;’1g_x.of; the-

petitioners to be worked out in’–aeeofd.ance ‘mm law before

any other forum.

gs [fudge