IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.10100 of 2011
====================================================
JAY PRAKASH GUPTA - Petitioner/s(s)
Versus
SRIMATI MADHU DEVI - Respondent/s(s)
====================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. RAJEEV KUMAR SINHA
For the Respondent/s: Mr.
====================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO
DATE: 01-07-2011
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO)
2. 01.07.2011 Heard learned Senior counsel Mr. T.N. Maitin appearing on
behalf of the petitioner.
The learned counsel submitted that earlier the amendment
application was rejected on the ground that no documents have been
filed in support of the number of plot. Therefore, second time another
application for amendment was filed by the plaintiff annexing the draft
publication of the survey khatiyan which was again rejected by the
court below on the ground that it is not finally published. Therefore,
third time present application was filed annexing final publication and
this time the learned court below rejected the said application on the
ground that earlier two occasions the prayer has been refused.
Issue notice to the respondents in admission matter to show
cause as to why this writ application be not allowed at the admission
stage itself. The petitioner shall take steps for notice in admission
matter on the sole respondent in ordinary process as well as registered
post both within two weeks.
Rule returnable within two months after issuance of notice.
S.S. (Mungeshwar Sahoo,J.)