High Court Kerala High Court

Joseph.T. vs State Of Kerala on 29 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
Joseph.T. vs State Of Kerala on 29 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 15982 of 2008(C)


1. JOSEPH.T., KILLIYANTHARA PADEETTATHIL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY SECRETARY TO
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, REP. BY

3. THE ASST.ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SMT.S.KARTHIKA

                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :29/10/2009

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
             --------------------------------------------------
                W.P.(C) NO.15982 OF 2008 (C)
             --------------------------------------------------
           Dated this the 29th day of October, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

Petitioner claims to be the son of C. Thankappan @

Thankachan, who was a Part Time Sweeper in the office of the 3rd

respondent. Sri. Thankappan expired on 7.10.2005, after

rendering about 22 years of service. Petitioner thereafter

submitted Ext.P1 application for employment under the dying in

harness scheme. That was considered and rejected by Ext.P4

order dated 15.4.2008 stating that married sons and daughters

are not considered as dependents of the Government Servant

who died in harness and hence are excluded from the purview of

the scheme. It is challenging this order that the writ petition is

filed.

In the cases of similar nature, as already held, marriage by

itself will not render one ineligible to claim employment under

the dying in harness scheme. In Ext.P4 the only reason stated for

rendering the petitioner ineligible for the benefit of the scheme is

marriage and having regard to the judgments of this court, the

reasoning adopted in Ext.P4 cannot be upheld. Reference in this

WPC.No.15982 /08
:2 :

connection is made to Ashkarali V. State of Kerala (2009(1)

KLT S.N.17).

Therefore, Ext.P4 will stand set aside and the first

respondent is ordered to reconsider the matter duly adverting

the dependency factor and decide on Ext.P4. This shall be done as

expeditiously as possible and at any rate within two weeks from

the date of production of a copy of the judgment before the first

respondent.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

(ANTONY DOMINIC)
JUDGE
vi/