K.M.Sudheesh vs The Regional Transport Authority on 3 August, 2007

Kerala High Court
K.M.Sudheesh vs The Regional Transport Authority on 3 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 14552 of 2007(G)


1. K.M.SUDHEESH, 11/360,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.I.DINESH MENON

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :03/08/2007

 O R D E R
                           S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                   ----------------------------------
                    W.P.(C)NO. 14552 OF 2007
                   -----------------------------------
           DATED THIS THE DAY 3rd OF AUGUST, 2007

                              JUDGMENT

The petitioner filed an application for regular permit, which was

granted. Along with the application he had also submitted proposed

timings in respect of the permit also. The 1st respondent, thereafter,

took the application for consideration and by Ext.P2 adjourned the

same directing the petitioner to submit a modified proposal with all

trips to Alathur- Kozhiknjampara. The petitioner contends that this

modified proposal is only in respect of timings. The question of

modification of the timings arises only at the time of settling of timings

by the 2nd respondent after grant of permit is the contention of the

petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. I am

satisfied that for consideration of the application for grant of permit, it

is not necessary to submit a modified proposal regarding the timings

especially since the petitioner has already, along with the application,

submitted a proposed timings.

In the above circumstances, I dispose of this writ petition with a

direction to the 1st respondent to consider application of the petitioner

W.P.(c)No.14552/07 2

without insisting on a modified proposal as directed in Ext.P2 as

expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *