High Court Kerala High Court

K.Subramanian vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
K.Subramanian vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 14 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 1237 of 2010(D)


1. K.SUBRAMANIAN, AGED 70 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE

3. THE ASST.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SANTHEEP ANKARATH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.SURENDRA MOHAN

 Dated :14/01/2010

 O R D E R
                         K. SURENDRA MOHAN, J.
                ------------------------------------------------------------
                      W.P(C) NO: 1237 OF 2010 D
                -----------------------------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 14th January, 2010.

                                    JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a person who has retired as an Assistant

Grade II from the office of the third respondent under the Kerala

State Electricity Board on 29.2.2000. The petitioner had earlier

joined the Panchayat Common Service having been advised for

appointment by the Kerala Public Service Commission. On his

appointment under the first respondent, he was relieved from the

Panchayat Common Service. He had lost his continuity in

employment while joining the services of the Kerala State Electricity

Board. The petitioner claims that his services under the Panchayat

Common Service be also considered for the purpose of calculating

the total length of service for the purpose of pension and other

retirement benefits. The complaint of the petitioner is that though

he had submitted Exts.P2 and P4 representations before the second

respondent, no orders have been passed thereon till date. In view

of the fact that Exts.P2 and P4 are pending consideration of the

second respondent, this writ petition can be disposed of directing

an early disposal of the said representations.

WPC 1237/2010 2

2. In view of the above this writ petition is disposed of

directing the second respondent to consider the grievance of the

petitioner set out in Exts.P2 and P4 representations in accordance

with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period

of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.





                                          K. SURENDRA MOHAN
                                                   Judge
jj

WPC 1237/2010    3

                      K.K.DENESAN & V. RAMKUMAR, JJ.

—————————————————-

M.F.A.NO:

—————————————————–

JUDGMENT

Dated: