Bombay High Court High Court

Smt. Santoshi Jagdish Agrawal vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation … on 14 January, 2010

Bombay High Court
Smt. Santoshi Jagdish Agrawal vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation … on 14 January, 2010
Bench: S.A. Bobde, V. A. Naik
                                        1

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY:

                        NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR




                                                                              
                     WRIT PETITION NO.5213 OF 2009




                                                      
    PETITIONER:                                                                     :
          Smt. Santoshi Jagdish Agrawal, aged about 43 years, occupation :




                                                     
          agriculturist, r/o Near Post Office, Dr. Bihade Block Telhara, Tq.
          Telhara Dist. Akola.
                                   VERSUS




                                           
    RESPONDENT:
                             
          Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. [A Govt. India
          Enterprises] through its Senior Regional Manager, Nagpur having
                            
          Regional office at Khapri LPG Filling Plant, Near Khapri
          Railway Station, Khapri Nagpur 441108.
    ===================================================
           


    Shri J.B. Gandhi, advocate for petitioner
        



    Shri P.D. Meghe, advocate for respondent
    ===================================================





    CORAM: S.A. BOBDE & SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK, JJ.

DATE: 14TH JANUARY, 2010.

ORAL JUDGMENT: [PER – S.A. BOBDE, J]

Rule returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of parties.

2] After hearing for some, the following order is passed by consent

of parties.

::: Downloaded on – 09/06/2013 15:30:54 :::
2

3] Petitioner’s representation which is said to be pending is directed

to be decided within a period of 15 days, by the Committee under

Grievance Redressal System of the respondent. Till such a decision and

for a period of one week thereafter, the respondent will not allot the

distributorship to any party. Petitioner shall be at liberty to approach

this court in case the decision is adverse to the petitioner.

4] Order accordingly. Rule disposed of.

                       JUDGE                     JUDGE

    smp.
             
          






                                                          ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:30:54 :::