Kamala Babu Bamanale vs Asst.Director on 21 April, 2009

IN THE HJGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE 2 13? my or APRIL   --    '

BEFORE.»  _ V %
HON' BLE MR. .JuSr1cr§=§.J1fI5.J:"G£I1\i._:;s;i;  
wan' mrrrron No;5g;g91  @009 i$'--nl1s:--.. 

BEYFWEEN:   AJ ..  V}
KAMALA BABU BAMAVN;'.§;i;EA   _  1 ~ 

AGE: 42 YEARS, occupamow: 'NIL  --- V 

R /0 MORAB VII.~LAGE,, RM.BAG- " 
BELGAUM Dl S1§'RI'C'I' ;_ * .  =   PETYTIONER

gavjvsiéy "EMA :<:u%1.,iV<AV£21§:I;~-;4t.r£\r.,)
1. AsS1s'r,wf Diiéficfiioiz
_-- WOMEN? AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT
..  BELGAUM. « %%%%% M _

V % <§fi1Lz§' mzvammgm' OFFICER
" TX 1_§A.§BA'G, 'i9Is*rmc:'r; BELGAUM

.93;  D1RE:C?I'bR women AND CHILD
 E!EV"E:LOPMENT DEPAR'l'MEN'I'

 BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD
BANGALORE - 560001  RESPONDENTS

THIS PETETION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227

Q9′ COSNTFPUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH
….:-WNEXURE A PASSED BY THE 13′!’ RESPONDENT DATED

12.1.2000 AND PASS AN ORDER DIRECTING THE 13′?

RESPONDENT REINSTATE THE PETrrroNER:.~«iN;fr c > 5’1fHE
SERVICE WITH ALL ARREARS or SALARY. _

THIS w.P. COMING ON F OR,.ERELiMiAN’iéS?»§iEA§e;1N9″ °

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE F’Ci;L OWING:__ ” A

.Q§;1—LEE.”

Petitioner claims _v #39 as
Anganawadi worker in Shfi further submits
that she had worked V however, no
mmunemtion;wai§;VL§givcI:§.,A on 12.1.2000,
a <:0PY of — 'A'. Present writ

petition is Appamntly, it is
noticed thatVa':s years fiom the date of
dismissal. 'Thcv;;}uest'&o1fl3V the clock back after lapse

of nine ndf Petition rejected. :

sd/~
JUDGE