BETWEEN:
1.
3.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA' 1' =7 "'
CERCUIT BENCH AT DgARwA.D V' C . .
DATED Tfiis THE mat DAY oF..A;évRi'2,;:E).Q9- 4' 7
BEFQRB: _ V V V
THE HORBLE MR.JUS*zé§A"~AD.I H9091, TALUK UDUPI.
.V - -_ ~~ ...RESPONDEN'I'S
(BY SR1. RAVE <3. SABHAHIT, ADV. FOR R-1 5 TO 9.
, A sR1.»2'#=,:v.VPATrL Ro'R~RUrsN'7;:;..,,o:z:2V:.-m AT ANX-A DATED 29.5.2007 PASSED BY
CML JU13c.2;::($R.DN; HGNNAWAR IN CLS.NO.169/2001 AND
COh'iSEQUEN}'LY ALLOW I.A.NO.II FILE!) BY THE PETXTONERS
UNDEF? ORDER 1 RULE 10 R'/W SECTION 151 OF CFC ANS ETC.
v " AA THIS PETITION COMENG ON FGFE PRELIMINARY HEARING
1:9 fB*'{}ROUP, THIS BAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
:3:
ORDER
The petitionew make an application under’
Rule 10 of the Code of Civii ?ro-cedure to be .
defendants 9 to 11 in the suit. T13; said .1suitj3gfii§deVfo§~” “~
declaration and also for partition. ‘I’h,_e
has rejected the said applicatioi).–.,_ As 1
petition is filed. —
2. When the matfier Weaé “before on
13/02[-fieie obeefiiee thus:
vv “”i’_ V appearing for the
Pfifitififlélfi that the petitioners are
égwflling for ieasmeaable settlement in the matter
‘ aledwééigfiieeable to purchase the suit
» for the reepondents by paying the
His submission is placed on
.. Nofiee re~sett1ement. The petitioners are
x * ._ pennitted to take out notice on the learned
counsel appearing for the respondents before the
trial court in additional to take out nofice
through the process of court.
W2
:4:
List immediately afier service of notice.”
When the matter was listed before the Court on
2009, the learned counsel appearing for the .
submitted that the would make an .efl’oxt u u
The matter is listed today. The 1ea:§m:1:’¢o~an§e1
the petitioners are not W1’lI1’ngfQ “s.ettie the
3. I have perused ofdver péissed by
the learned trial Judge. ‘
4. Judge has found
that the pefifnners fiat necessary parties to
the .:<_2.«uit_of the impugned order,
I am 51" not warran: interfezwmoe.
No mei-"§__:. If the pdifianms have any right,
"it filing a separate suit.
– Siifi
Ind ‘e
15.35;