High Court Karnataka High Court

Kamaladevi Srikantaiah vs G Venkate Gowda on 23 May, 2011

Karnataka High Court
Kamaladevi Srikantaiah vs G Venkate Gowda on 23 May, 2011
Author: H.Billappa
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNAéiA1s:A... 3A:x;i34%\;L-'DAY O1~?.V_ixfiAY, 1;'. j; "
BEFOR.-}_?_jJ'~~._ v '-  

THE HoN'B{_.5j. 

BETWEEN:

1. Smt.Kama1adE:Vi S:ikanta.§.:a}_1;--..  A

Aged about 83 years-,_   I 
D/0. late Janard1f1%:;nc:j:g0_wda 
And wife of N.S:.'ika,:1té;i'a;k1} ' '

R/a.Door   ._  

V.V.M0ha1Ia'," Ivlysgiiafe.  "

2. SH1t.AIaIn€1E_iU1IIiEi,   % 
Aged about B_8';{ea1*s,'    
D/(Mate Janar.dhane§f0Wda?   V
And wife of May;'3..nr1a,V c;_ow:ia;..---~
R/a.Kumg:ri 'i]i11ag€~,.,V_ V' V I

 " .  ..... .. y
Shimoga Dis"triC:I'A«..

3. Sf:1t;Chikk%3;tha§fa1hma,

 V' =..___Ag€d aézutiijt 58 

D ,5 0.Eaté:Jat:__:1fcB:'£an€goxvda,

_ _T«T'-«.'EJ';'a.».Mestri Change Gewcia,
'  'Rf i>.?qf1_digéinahaI1i,
_ " .__fi'%_agzirna::g$a}a Taluisg
V '--_ 3%I1§L1C}:jfI§§ ' Eiistric:t§

_ V fippsilfints 2 and 3 are rep. by 1%.}.
 §.S*P9wer af Aisterney hoidmz

E

... Appeilants



Kw.)

(By Sri.K.V.N3.rasimha11, Adv.)
AND:

1. Gflfenkate Gowda,

Aged about 68 years?
S/ofiovinde Gowda,

R/a. Lakshmisagara vifiage,
Pandavapura Taluk,
Mandya District.

(Appeal against R1 is Dis1Ifist§é€d"--  é

as Abated vide C0urtvOrder    V
Dated 20--o'7~2o09f)_j  '  

2. Smt.Ptutta1ak3h'am§1j_1a. 'V  __ 
Aged about 60 j*ea::f:é;_, ' ' "
W/0.JavaraVppa,_  'i::__  ..
R/a.Ka11ah,:Hi Vilhge,  é ._
Naga1nanga1a -~   

3. Sri.Rajashe'i:ara§

Aged ab0u_t_/115 yéafs,» _ 
Q.1ate..E§ame gowda, V
{Vs/é'.--Krishhé:g.0\xx'da  Tfiéinme gowda)
1' ,2" 8,. NeE:}atI1ar;ai2.3.1*i.i millage,
PaIid.3bJ.apVu:éi'--Ta1t:kf_}~

V    
 Sirgce dead, 'mp'; by LRs.,

 ti) '-Madhusudhan
«V *  "S anzfirdhane Gowda,
" «. Ag«:>_d'32' years,

V V   
" 5;'-0.£Ja:'1a:*dha:1€: {}<}w:i*:1,

;i,':;;,,«'"'



Aged 30 years,

C} Saraswathamma,
W/.ia:s3 Krishnée C:<}wV2i3':r"e'g3.:iy,j;~:s_1f:"'~--   _  V
10. Smt.Laksham.ma, «  .. 
D/0.13:6 G0vif1deA'gow<i*;5,;'--   

11. Sri.B0:fe GoWda,["'~._ %  V' __ __
S / 0.1ai:e Putté: .VVCnk'at_aI:zi::i1a';--- ', ,_ b V' ' ' V'
12. Smi. Sushe.e1amma;~--, V '

D /0.13116 If'i.,:'i;é;;3. Veni;2;ta:nma.

1.3..  = Ci*i:i3,:1appaj,,

 D/(>.EsZ:==::*'::«paI:1:":*;;;3.,  '

s::§:.N:::ga:::ma§

  _R';'jfi,5 are deleted Vida
."V.._{3:37;2f£'-Qfsler §:&24,5..'2GG4.
 __  Sfrxzifiagazaayrza,
'' ' -_ D',:''_§.}é§f€ Ksmgaznma,

r:=:<:'<;:.'£;i'.- V'



.V1"w'3'v'£aj0:, A _ V . 
 _ W/Q. Late "Rai"1:eg'0wda§

Aged 46 jgeslrs,

Firs': wife of Krishnegowda
@ Thammegowda.

R/3. Lakshmisagara village,
Pandavapura Taluk,
Mandya District.

1?. Smt.Devamma,
If)/0.121?/e Kaiamma, majar,
(End wife of Krishna Gowda
@ Thammegowda,
r/afhattekere Village,
Nagamangala Taluk,
Mandya District.

18. Smt.Su.nandam1fna,  

D/olate Kalarnma,  _
Majorg 3 

R/a. Lakshmisag9;2iré_'"1iié;gcfif,  .,  --

Pandavapura Tai-uk-,-- 1',
Mandya Disi1*i'ti"L;- _ x

19. smt.G dwi'ammé;,'  .. 
Major,  %  

(2% Wife of Krisfinegowcia  "

Thamme" .§§3<:¥xwia) H V
 a:vLak3hmj-sagagra Village,
Pa-:1d.ava.pura Talpiis.

:29. "::;Ft;iit<§'SI;iV2i1;:_E:._aV:};;fV1'V}/Tia,

.1 .f:_§,'1 .sm:,.ABhég;,ra,
V /o ;Lé3;j:€ Rélfflfi Géwda,



6

22. Smt.Sujatha,
Ma}GI',
D/o.R3.megowda.   

23. Smt.L4ai/ha?
Major,
D /0. Late Ramegowda.

Si. No.20 to 23 are residents
Of Lakshmisagara Village,  
Pandavapura Taluk,  
Mandya District.

24. Sri.Kariswar:1y'£}bwd:a, : =
Major, _. 44  " '
Kadenahalli V11} age  ' 

Melukote Hrébli,     
Pandavapura T2ilL:Ii:., 'A

Mandya Diéstrict. V 

25. Sri.Sami'a,__Hanum4anth?é;=Gowda,
S / 0.Cha1j:1egoxVda_? ' -   
Rf at. Lal;:3hmisagara..Vi11age,
'PafidaV'api11Fa Taluk, H """ H
Niandya ..Di,3_triCi.,_ V __ . . Respondents

(By B.L.Asha§ Adv- for R425}

Sri.»M.R.Raj}g;gOpa1, Adv, for Rwii (2142)

1&5? 7,15;–21; 22 $5 25)

$>i<*={<5i<2'<

u "'Fi1i_§s is filed under Section 96 0f CFC against the

and d€Cf€€' dated 01.02.2001 pass€d in
'kJ%'::*%V.s.,%Nb.:4;9:s by the Acifii. cm: Judge; 8111311.,

§ /

3;§_,x""

B33,

7
Srirangapaina, dismissing the suit far partition and separate

possession.

This R.F’.A. coming cm for hearing this

deiivemd the following:

JUnGMEN$?*

The learned counsel for seéiks time.
There is no justification U3 ‘«..Ti*}ié:efore§ the appeal
is dismissed for n0nfpros€C,tiitiQ’;1.

‘T6417’ Sg/i
‘ §§$QE