High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Kartar Singh vs Uco Bank Through Its General … on 18 November, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Kartar Singh vs Uco Bank Through Its General … on 18 November, 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH




                                                    C.W.P. No. 10242 of 2008
                                                    Date of Decision: Nov. 18, 2008



Kartar Singh ........................................................ Petitioner

                                    Versus

UCO Bank through its General Manager
and others ............................................................ Respondents




Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta
       Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta


Present:        Mr. P.S.Khurana, Advocate
                for the petitioner.

                Mr. Pawan Bansal, Advocate
                for the respondents.

                                          ....

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has prayed that directions be issued to

respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to release the Provident Fund, to pay the arrears of

subsistence allowance and further to decide the appeal against the order

dated 30.11.1999 passed by the Disciplinary Authority.

Reply has been filed in Court on behalf of the respondents

wherein it has been averred that as far as the relief with regard to the

payment of Provident Fund is concerned, the petitioner has been given a

reminder wherein it has been stated that he should visit the Branch and sign

the papers so that his case for release of terminal benefits be sent to the

Head Office for consideration.

[ 2 ]

C.W.P. No. 10242 of 2008

In view of the above, the petitioner may submit and sign the

papers at the office of Sujapur, Jagraon Branch. In case the petitioner

completes all the papers then the Provident Fund be released to him within a

period of three months from the date of completion of the papers.

Counsel for the respondents further submits that the petitioner

has been released the subsistence allowance vide Annexure R1 and hence

this prayer has been rendered infructuous. The last relief claimed by the

petitioner that his appeal be ordered to be decided expeditiously has also

become infructuous as the appeal has been decided vide order Annexure R2.

In view of the above, nothing survives in the writ petition and

the same is disposed of.

( ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA )
JUDGE

( RAJAN GUPTA )
JUDGE
18.11.2008
rupi