Krishnakumar vs The Regional Transport Authority on 10 January, 2008

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 37623 of 2007(D)


1. KRISHNAKUMAR, PULIKKALTHODI HOUSE,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT

3. SRI.V.SELVAM, S/O.UNNIKRISHNAN,

4. SRI.HAMSA, KARUVANKUZHIYIL HOUSE,

5. THE STATE TRANSPORT APPELLANTE

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :10/01/2008

 O R D E R
                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                     ===============
                 W.P.(C) NO. 37623 OF 2007 D
               =====================

           Dated this the 10th day of January, 2008

                         J U D G M E N T

Petitioner submits that in a timing conference that was held

for revising the timings of the 4th respondent, while effecting

revision, the 3rd respondent’s timing also has been revised to the

prejudice of the petitioner. An objection was filed and that was

rejected by Ext.P4. Against Ext.P4, revision was filed by Ext.P5

and that was also rejected by Ext.P6 and it is challenging Exts. P4

and P6 this writ petition has been filed.

2. The only objection that is raised before me is that

while issuing Ext.P2 revised timings of the 4th respondent, 3rd

respondent’s time of departure from Ottappalam at 8.12 a.m has

been changed as 8.22 a.m. Admittedly, as per Ext.P1 timing of

the petitioner, the petitioner’s departure time is 8.30 from

WPC 37623/07
:2 :

Ottappalam. If that be so, there is no direct clash and in view of

this, there cannot be any sustainable objection to Exts.P4 and P6.

Writ petition fails and is dismissed.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.

Rp