Laxmikanta Dule Naik vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 14 December, 2008

0
133
Karnataka High Court
Laxmikanta Dule Naik vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 14 December, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda
% BETWEEN    

IN THE HIGH COHRT 0? KARNATAKA, cmcgm %

AT DHARWAD. 

DATED THIS THE xwf my O33""'D--£c'E  kk

i7~'f2ESENT*   *5" -

THE HONBLE MR.JUs*:*i{§E_%K. ¥sR.EEmf:Af€RA;a5
THE HONBLE MR. Jt5S':*1C§: }3:.:'S1§:§*3:i53ifJI\z§§SE GOWDA

. M  'V

1, LA'>{MHAYANAND & D s NAIR, ADvs.}

1%. LV ,r§ATIoNALT::1NsURANcE CGMPANY LTD
R};'<3P"-BY' ITS MANAGER, MAJOR IN AGE
16§18_,3'KA;¥IGNI ROAD, KARWAR.  RESPONDENT

– .{3:gr Slip B RAJU, ADVQCATE)

i MFA FILED U/S 173(1) 0:? MV ACT AGAINST ‘mg

“JUDGMENT AND AWARD DA’PED:20.1G.G3 PASSED IN
~MVC NOJ29/02 01»: ‘mg FILE 0;? THE ADDL. CIVIL

JUDGE (SRIJN) AND MEMBER, 2ND ADBL. MACH’,

2
KARWAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT <35'
COMPENSATION 'WITH INTEREST AT 12% AND THE
APPELLANT HEREIN FURTHER PRAYS TO PASS AN
AWARD AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS Jo1NTLY'j,AND
SEVERALLY BY SEWING ASIDE THE mpufifixsm
ORDER. . T"Qgf";*

This Appeal is caming on for V.

SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered £1135: ‘fi)i’10’.W”i:i1g2_:~ _
JUDGMENT’ T Tj
The appellant (;J<:titio:':jc%:Vi*}-%» of 'V

medial condyle of righ~i;.§j:bia'"i'1i 'a§ ;_*i§3iQ: ve}ii(':i6' acciden{.

The ocréufréryjr: 0Vf_ 21£:'Ci(i_(:r;t, .fiégligem:e and insuraxlce
policy am not '«'=I'he petitionsr was operated.

T}";ez'<–';– is sfio1{Vt¢11ii1g."-0f.iim¥3 by 1". The perrnanem

."'dis$biiiti§' ti) ai§ééSsed at 10%. The petitioner is at

Cf€V3{3&ii€°:. fn:%:%'ja7bsenc€ of czredibiti: proof, the iIi"1(3{)fi1€: is to

Z _ beAi:1fe1j:E'e'é.,LAia%.f;T Rs:2,1GO/ — pea' month. The izzcome 1033

H " 'T4A'''–. §;r3po1$:iefiate to the disabiiity is R32 10/ –~ par mtmth.

V' * 8:1 reappreciation of 'aha eviderxcs, the

VT " -peititicner is entitled tor C01'3:1p€I1S3Ii0¥1 under iihe faiiewing

' " heads:«

. Pain and agony

. Loss of amenities and ciiscomforts

Rs.30,0{}()/-;

Rs*..1(),{}00/-

. Medical bills am pmduced fer Rs.2{},O()()/ —-. En

petitioner is to be grantsd R$.25,000/ —

211151 incidental expenses.

. Loss 0:” income during 1J~eatméjfit’

..,Rs. 30,0001».

. Loss of future income dn«§{:::Qu11.t” of 10 ‘V

(iflcflfllé) X 12 (mcilihs) (‘m’i1’1¥;T1;91ie1:)’ :”RS;;}5,35Q[ -.

ii’; ;_a.1}1_ ‘;)€’sE17_t_i’t>1f;c:r I is entitled 116: a total

compefifiatiéxa 51* R’é.{‘1,2’®.,f%é:O/- as agaixmt Rs.5’§),0}G/~

awa;i<_;1édu.by £he:..V_Tfibz§111a1. The petiticner is entitled to

aif: on the enhaliced compensatien fi'{)m 'aha

till payment. A

xtzvb.

Sd[-

Judge

Sd/–

Judge

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *