High Court Karnataka High Court

Laxmikanta Dule Naik vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 14 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Laxmikanta Dule Naik vs National Insurance Company Ltd on 14 December, 2008
Author: K.Sreedhar Rao& Gowda
% BETWEEN    

IN THE HIGH COHRT 0? KARNATAKA, cmcgm %

AT DHARWAD. 

DATED THIS THE xwf my O33""'D--£c'E  kk

i7~'f2ESENT*   *5" -

THE HONBLE MR.JUs*:*i{§E_%K. ¥sR.EEmf:Af€RA;a5
THE HONBLE MR. Jt5S':*1C§: }3:.:'S1§:§*3:i53ifJI\z§§SE GOWDA

. M  'V

1, LA'>{MHAYANAND & D s NAIR, ADvs.}

1%. LV ,r§ATIoNALT::1NsURANcE CGMPANY LTD
R};'<3P"-BY' ITS MANAGER, MAJOR IN AGE
16§18_,3'KA;¥IGNI ROAD, KARWAR.  RESPONDENT

– .{3:gr Slip B RAJU, ADVQCATE)

i MFA FILED U/S 173(1) 0:? MV ACT AGAINST ‘mg

“JUDGMENT AND AWARD DA’PED:20.1G.G3 PASSED IN
~MVC NOJ29/02 01»: ‘mg FILE 0;? THE ADDL. CIVIL

JUDGE (SRIJN) AND MEMBER, 2ND ADBL. MACH’,

2
KARWAR, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT <35'
COMPENSATION 'WITH INTEREST AT 12% AND THE
APPELLANT HEREIN FURTHER PRAYS TO PASS AN
AWARD AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS Jo1NTLY'j,AND
SEVERALLY BY SEWING ASIDE THE mpufifixsm
ORDER. . T"Qgf";*

This Appeal is caming on for V.

SREEDHAR RAO, J., delivered £1135: ‘fi)i’10’.W”i:i1g2_:~ _
JUDGMENT’ T Tj
The appellant (;J<:titio:':jc%:Vi*}-%» of 'V

medial condyle of righ~i;.§j:bia'"i'1i 'a§ ;_*i§3iQ: ve}ii(':i6' acciden{.

The ocréufréryjr: 0Vf_ 21£:'Ci(i_(:r;t, .fiégligem:e and insuraxlce
policy am not '«'=I'he petitionsr was operated.

T}";ez'<–';– is sfio1{Vt¢11ii1g."-0f.iim¥3 by 1". The perrnanem

."'dis$biiiti§' ti) ai§ééSsed at 10%. The petitioner is at

Cf€V3{3&ii€°:. fn:%:%'ja7bsenc€ of czredibiti: proof, the iIi"1(3{)fi1€: is to

Z _ beAi:1fe1j:E'e'é.,LAia%.f;T Rs:2,1GO/ — pea' month. The izzcome 1033

H " 'T4A'''–. §;r3po1$:iefiate to the disabiiity is R32 10/ –~ par mtmth.

V' * 8:1 reappreciation of 'aha eviderxcs, the

VT " -peititicner is entitled tor C01'3:1p€I1S3Ii0¥1 under iihe faiiewing

' " heads:«

. Pain and agony

. Loss of amenities and ciiscomforts

Rs.30,0{}()/-;

Rs*..1(),{}00/-

. Medical bills am pmduced fer Rs.2{},O()()/ —-. En

petitioner is to be grantsd R$.25,000/ —

211151 incidental expenses.

. Loss 0:” income during 1J~eatméjfit’

..,Rs. 30,0001».

. Loss of future income dn«§{:::Qu11.t” of 10 ‘V

(iflcflfllé) X 12 (mcilihs) (‘m’i1’1¥;T1;91ie1:)’ :”RS;;}5,35Q[ -.

ii’; ;_a.1}1_ ‘;)€’sE17_t_i’t>1f;c:r I is entitled 116: a total

compefifiatiéxa 51* R’é.{‘1,2’®.,f%é:O/- as agaixmt Rs.5’§),0}G/~

awa;i<_;1édu.by £he:..V_Tfibz§111a1. The petiticner is entitled to

aif: on the enhaliced compensatien fi'{)m 'aha

till payment. A

xtzvb.

Sd[-

Judge

Sd/–

Judge