Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 15 December, 2008

0
46
Karnataka High Court
Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 15 December, 2008
Author: Ravi Malimath
-1-

IN THE HIGH comm' 01? KARNATAKA AT BA§GAi;§F§E..\ 

DATED 'I'HiS THE ism DAY o1?..13$CE:sd}3E§zv,2*Q08  "  k

BEFORE:T «
'1'HE HON '}3:;,}3: MR.JUb'TI{;E  i*.tiALi2§/i;§J§;TlrI. 
wmsr PE'I'I'I'IOI\§ No.99497_;:._1Is= ~:2oo7% €3.01 31*')

BETWEEN :

Sri.Satyan, M   _ _ '. 
S/0 Late K-:.'Ap%pu,"""   VL 
Aged about--50».yz3ars,'   '
ResidingatNc;.453:,»'- 
21" Cress, .3"  - '
Jayanagar,._ _  
E3angaI<tm::a5ES() (}"11"."  .  é . . . . PEPYFIONER

(BX? '§§E%I.D.;{1'Li*!§§;;l\¥@IUvI€DA REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL

   K:SI{AS'Efi'i{IRAN SHETPY, ADVOCATE.)

1; '  '»{'3;£3fi1missioner,
Bang,a}e'fe Rural District,
V.V.Tc4we;rs, Podium Block,

 " [);.B;"R.Ambedkar Road,
=_B a1ngaiore.

    The Assistant Commissioner,

Ramanagar Sub---Divisi0n,
Ramanagar.

3. Sri.Rama Krishna,
S / 9 Sfi.S1mk'a Rediijy",



Aged about 54 years,

R / at Hakkipukki Colony,
Bannikuppe Panchayath,

Bidadi I-Iobli, Ramanagaram Taluk,
Bangalore Rurai District.   '

A-ac.

 mas9o;m1»*ss'%s s T

(BY sMT.M.C.NAGAsHRs}3:,-iricorisos   A

SRI.VIVEK s. REDDY FOR 1<;;s.}sUBBaAoRE_:)1:3Y,"o 
ADVOCATES FOI_§_"<I§[?E?,,_§3.) o 

'r%**

This Writ Petition :is'*f1i§:ciV'urncior"v_A;'t'i£:ies 226 and
227 of the (L'oI1;~3t;isEs.1f:'§on=:oi' glnrdiaé. ;5rayingf'to call for the
rsoords which hasgjoltimately 3_.fI:s_1.1}t£.d'"'iz1 passing the
impugned orltierfdated .1'4;fj1sAI';2Q96-V,Apassed by R} vide
AImox11reV+A_afl{1"tiia_ord¢i' ;1a.tod__V5.5;2OO6 passed by R2
Vida A11nvexurL*~VB»q21ash tlrxoofder dated 14.11.2006
passed by 1%.} axici':'t1fi'c:,To1*riVi(:r. dated 5.5.2006 passed by
R32 and etc. = "   

'Fhi.s  v on for orders this day, the

 " 'Cou1'f_fi1a;is the foil' 'v¥ifig2-

ORDER

A “it: of the petitioner that the schedule

Sy.No.95 to an extcni of two acres

giaiatss at Balmikuppe Village, Bidadi Hobli,

Taluk, Bangalore Rural District was

“orig’11a11y wanted to the third respondent on

W”

10.8.1982. After the expixy of 15 years,

was obtained from the Government for the ” _

the land and in terms of the Gover7::;1Ir3e§:;tfo,lette:f,’ 2:

deed dated 8.9.1997 was exec1_1ted.* Q11 an ‘V

made by the third
Assistant Commissione%f._”‘;3y othe o1V’vt’;iei; dated
5.5.2006 set aside the restoration
of the lands’ ‘ ufvjthe Karnataka
soheou1oo_%eo.otoo:,e % (Prohibition of
‘i’ransief~._oi’ eggrieved by the same,

the petifiofier appeal to the Deputy

Comxnjseioner, lo}; the order dated 14.11.2006

by confirming the order of the

Aesi$:anf’Cio11a.r;iiesioner. Hence this petition.

A 2.” Tfiie gounds urged and the prayer made is

V’ with the one raised in Writ Petition

.’..1szo.i994 1/2007. The said writ petition has been disposed

~; ofi’ by the order dated 15.12.2008. In Vi€’W of the

W

common eontenticms urged by the 1ea1’fi_’éci” _
counsel appearing for the petitioner ‘v
appearing for the respondem:s:;A_V fivpetjfiefi ‘it?

disposed ofi’ in terms of the»ji;1e§1gneI;_t’

passed in Writ Petition No. 99§e1,i 29Q7.% %J ‘

For the afoI*esajc–i$ ‘V 35,, _..,:§””I§’1f:£,’»’_1«3ctition being

devoid of mexjts’ =

No costs. ,

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here