CI’1.R.P.13’22.U7
1 ‘
m Tu 31:33 GDIJRT or muarau
cmctsrr amen AT nnmwm & A x _ é
zzmrrm ms ‘rm new nu cur { ,
‘In Hazrnm nm.Jus:r.1r;n: ‘ é
cm. 3.9. no.1a’gM ‘gj.g’g»
netwcm. ‘
Smv Naik Bviailur, ‘
egamymm, %
Gm: Iilneputgr Re$,gisf:af~~¢;f_ V ‘ ‘
Ca-owafim ‘ ‘ ._
nt; sat’
Rfiat: Bn:@sguu1,.mwVw§ar1fi1.”tg”‘a,s . ‘
Deputtr Registrar fif
SHIRE, at
Cc-apemti-nae: Factury Ltd.
M. K. Be1ga3.:m_ Dist. PE-TIIIOIER
fl 2». Hague and &’i.flmra:u1Ipu Mam.-u,
« –. mt Karnatal-za,
A 4. _ Ej_¢* Pkznfihe,
‘ L ~g5 5’r &’i…Rm;r:i,wu-gnu xmuu, ac. C/annual, slang with
smxr. M. 13uyuthri.,. Addl.SPP]
C§rl.E..P. 1312.0?
I-2|
Gr1.R,P. ht filed under aectiom 397′ 85 4017 ¢}f
Cr.P.-C-=. the advncate for the patiticner praying
Hanfiie C-curt may be pleased 1:: ebaside the. ”
13.9%}? passed by Special Judgc, Bclgaum,
C .42.’-.N::3.l2,F 209?, arfl ate,
pfititfilkfl r::Jm1;rg’ on far adrIi1isa*5_idriTV
Ccaurt made the fa11caWin.g:. V 4_
1; 5-‘: case 1’11 Erime Belgaum
mmysazrma 7, 13 (1)
[d}11-,a’w :3 gm of was as
agajiissrz and
” H952 . The
of Hugm-, Atlmni Tajnk.
” complainant has alleged that
1:-ehnfl . J: his community
iizltfendead %;11_A’i-r-wkteer an asauciatinn in the name of
4: Mahmnsnazr Alpaaankhyatara Vnridodeslmgah
%% Sufi-ngha. They wanted to get it registered. On
: t’flfi~[1flEiT3i{3’E 513.03% with the necessary dacumenm, they
‘ went in the zcsflce cf the Assistant Regfmh-ar of Co-operative
JL–
‘2’.’rLR.P. 3311.0?
sncieam. C21’1iklv.:-ca-di and through the said dfioe, mquiaitign
was mearle far regiatratinzl in the nice of Elvepuigr
of CG-n::}:ve:raiiV.na Societias, Belgaum. The
forwraxfieé 113 A5-sistam
wmmmmdaficn far reguktration.
when met
p¢t:itfi:ax1ea1~ 5:;-iii that mere. =*-if is
of no um; am: they will mm inform
the mm mm
the regiiaa*.’a*=a&an;” the complainant
Palm 3′ pfimzbnct Thc
find on the very day, he
paid a xgf” agreed to pay balance
3. later pain: of timc and
that it would be paid after the
-thf tinn. Pm-mja’ sion was awarded
the share amcuxrt. ‘The cznmphinant
‘V j ‘f;1m share amount from 211 pcraom. Another
H was far-warded {harm the Assistant Reg15’ trar,
an m«.cs1.2o02 tn the ofiiac crf the petitioner
‘ In. the a-aifl rega_rcL the.-‘ cnmplainant net the
y?–Q1AA2:;M«L___
Ctl.R.P. 1322.07
petitioner herein on 13.01.2003. The petitioner eeeteteded
the balance amount of Rs. 12,000/-
to be paid. The complainant… bi’.
Rs.8,000/- is already paid andttliat he
only Rs. 10,000/-. The
The petitioner stated the to be paid
on 20.01.2003 and the complainant
will be to. for the same.
As the pay the amount of
Rs. wanted to take action
egajeet virent to me Lokayuktha Police
and . organised. Pre-trap formalities
.eem.p1eted.e~on 20.01.2003 the trap was bid. The
per the instructions of the reading offioers
go over to the ofice of the petitioner here1n’
AA and pay the money of Rs.10,000/- on. demand. The
* petitioner called Chandrakant Satori Gurav and informed
that the complainant will give Rs. 10,000/- and that he
should receive and the certificate should be issued. The
second accused-Chandrakant Sateri Gurav, Senior
Inspector of Co-operative Societies collected Rs. 10,000 / –
9C,&Lv\aJ:1;
‘J1’1.R.P. 1311.0?
Wfih him mm hand, ccstzntad the mane}; with both
The euaauis were keenly nbserved by the
sviémtass-.3. Thu mrwlainanat gaw: a
thv;-. party. TE party E111?’-“…’.»’IE!.d_.4 ‘4 2
the pe’£fl.io:1¢r and as-amused
‘TE rnnnejr was Erf %
C – Satcri Guraiwi
wash r.Ira.s given to the L. Sate-.ri
G121-av. ‘.{‘h:: s::1*qf;i<i~:§1v:. was
drawn" the acxzrtsused,
tl1L':_yg:a"=..='Is: tximir her-sin denied
his sf the oflence. TIE
a-eatznncl Sateri Gurav also denied of
afier completion of the
i V' glen charge sheet. The case was set down
. before charge arfl amongst other grounds,
t1r1.-EL: ccsntenfled that he is entilzload for a discharge
H §§§'O'EII1:i that there was rm 5+:-u:u:1:1n' 11 actzazxrderi and
{he a'.€s%:*z:m".<ti~cx3=:-2 mtrught by the prcrsescutixug agcncy was
3 rfiusegzi. Unriaar the Government {Denier dated 14.05.2004
)L«eR.AACu.]/L–__
C-'r1.F..P. 1322.0?
bearfixg No.SafE,{5.’:’.: AfSa}’S’se}’2ChZ’|3, the trial Covurt
that ass fltte peti&sner was wt 5 pubiic servant as
date of ‘t.-akjng of the , am such no
x’ec11m.,B¢’ .3 and that prmsecuti11g
patitiotmr wgflmut awn 3. aanctw’ n he 3-l
order mefjaimg ta award
2,. Efmue hearci ani
Smt.T.Ez:I..Ga§.»*atlu’i, mung-.;-.1
3,; «’t}ifE”‘r:ri;,a¢, the poinm that
arfuse fi:s:~ case asre:
“;aia1*wtfion is raquirad ufa. 19 of the
% of Cnrruptinn Act, 1933 in the
A case?
Ab} can be: taken after t1:u=.=.’
delbnquent had ccaseafl tuna hnld the cnflioe
ahursfi though ha cantixmes to be a public
a¢rvm1t in my nthm’ r.:=.apacit._’,r at flflfi time of
,,(2L,£lA/xxx/’L1/g
C-‘I'{.R.P.13fl.U?
taking cc:-gnimr1cc, Sections 19 (1) being
a.1:Idufi1’1s:e related? VT
in 1934 am;-. [cl-is 19-2 has held
mnaiitimz and the saw would he a
accused mntinues ta be a ‘a:;:__ Erf %
thc taklm mi’ «
upon the judgxuent of in the
case (if .PI.EN.fl.B
av mom %h§1a that if the
accruaenzi is .,-a; ta be public
servant gg. §:.-.f dfiaz-21:: category, no
saxmfifln 51-.{ 19 (1) of the Act
:1) arm: 01:1 Act is rwceaaary.
If. th»: judgment in the case. of LALLU
mum our aman (2007 (1; 31.:
. {S33}; has. heki that c-fihncas cramtemplated under
-rnf Conuption Act, by the.-it vmy nature
H be ma-sated as afiellcm cammitted by a public
Whale aming 433:1′ purporting toA act in d.ischa.rge of
his o1%::ia:Tauqr,. 1: has further hem am the Ending in
Mmafi;
0:123. 1322,02
R.S.Na3.ralc’a cast: ‘a not per imam-iaan, that sanction ufa
19: of E1-.P.C. isdifia:-e11t fiam zsaxnctiun u;
Preue11tion afflorruptinnfict. b L. 1
5. Lpzaxmi mums] far 1116
Ammem demed 20,09,200? it
in para ‘.2 that he has tn wait
between 01.11.2005 to 13.p3.2&9L”r§.L’V;ee
Ammzee-J detailed ;_mle of
‘ lira of
ca-hlmn 3, it 7n 2(_)0’7, he
had d::a’wn1isa1a1jy’__v ‘ Registrar of Ca-operative
the hetweex1 19.03.1997 to
5vE””‘L:Afi3;§i§’:«.:1aetitione1′ ‘H deputed an a Secretary to
since 24.04.2007′. In the
preseaautixzg agency appl1ed’ ‘ for grant of
aanctinning authari1:y, the Sec:reta.ry,
of Karma’ taka and the sancth rung’ authority
tuder dated 14.05.2004 ibr the reasons eeemem
evietafifi, refused to accord aanctiuzan. The said order reads
asunder: ‘ %
..a.–
garui iwargd 363951,:
aasoau = an “no-a-;s..’:wa..d. 3555636 asoarw an
a’-mogsiau, Mme oaoaut was amxnrc-are
no.3.» wfiuomva oyodditaziau Sabra;
o.m.noa..a..a:_. «suntan: agian-ca :.unur.1.f_J “g
aware auczwu ‘ :..mo+-wean-auras
‘banana : 1: ;:5o:§g=;$6’a.t::2aa1a(a)=ao–2=;:’édI4§2fC103:”~ 3
T % T =asa9..Oaao:=O8-_-08-200?,”-..,.’ —
2- assure us -o_a.’a~:-toag.’:n”&:$ed§’:§§:§a:_
2001, 0:£oa:2§-{C)3-{:.’b’C1v1’°._ .;« p
E; 31.33 5
iarorus duae_m§o.5§:§=~1_, a§u*g;éca_’»§§s36w-sonata were
Mi ,~2,,?§t3$ 3309;-;’:r,?7′”§ *3′ M °° ‘3 ‘”°°”‘~°-
was _;so§m «:5; .E1:_;_aopI?:J 642.9; again. wgacsaq can aauuaroa-a
6-agave 1988us1″:u;;.V-‘7′.”1§%C;1)'(a)’ ‘z..c>#uaoa> am 13(-2,)ue
egoduacaz taraaaq %zncouuaa_.d -‘
-g3§’ai:’bJ’é$£.§’6€pQd«;§€§,a.,__3’~*J§fi.0t3$ 31560603 5; $596 szdioaii
‘aaocsd _a’_”,A=~ £ wiaad =’:S’u!es3a§’r::,, ¢;v.3083c so and-Jaccsaza ms nu
aoqasa-nu fiufaeocsa’o¢§3:g*::»;””<;:(oaa3ruazsau:$arn 3,1 aeywaaao
auoaa, auur?7I'm§:J,..6s'rfaa"'6ada oaraos : 15-01-£003 cow
aijcxoo tnvnaaoau aasséo .-Wag was asmgsaod
,a)(ac_So<3§5&'$.) am; can; 10, 000 — oe rlvaide, mam sauna
%¢ae,¢a{%g.a¢,as'ms~: aaaos___= 20–.<s;–.2oo3 dew vim-"as ewe, saoao-.:v_,
scat'-se.a3-'c-s§§,'A'T:=:5vnaa 'n6…_' c:.:aaa"&a<aaa:jI§',ocs_u sgcaa came; :
30-*@..1-E;%'3~uom,_ge,owar-gsaaaaau wa – 8, 000-00 nvaaq
._c:s-oascw'a,.z an-aiauoaaufi, names aognv was auoqsmu oaon
'»fj~§Ag§'w an-can ear» a maze; 5):' au'-'Mn-A':-su:1u;'s_ amaze aoégm
amzmu aowaagn mew zkeadow a as,#§cs 93011 man
agaagwau. Qaauaoauua, fiaaeeejauu nun can ma. aogdaafiowuan
126- /otQJ.p~_c«.ELL__
amoauaaaa—3
.. 11–
T31
macaw. zrasm. egsw = am: asuwu aanut. w.,aacu
assaraauv-_ as-sou saomncocs aor:..o€..:aoaa*
(1) :,’aoa’..m-maado aoagoauaug
«cuss,-¢:\:¢> canoes : 13-o1–.2oc2ua aq’&}?a,.[j£— *
aorfi his.-wu’a’..u, 13555335 “3013!!! .. ‘V
i5cbi1.J’atic$».)33.;6’:””” “4 ‘ A’
(2) esmaam made ea;-&na3:!u gi;.<.ao.i5«-
(3) 3;; ac;-a-aowa;;a1."'a5%mtao"'an§n:f as auopsoo
– can €’.g._4_:’s’.;.-.a~:c’-‘.:s..pa5L’2:a:»_,;.<V..;'v's%…,.% mafia; oaaaaag »
mg?) dJ'é§%¢'."!;$§3g::'ao_€6<iJEJ35€'. ' 'I'ct:l..\.;_ aaaszoouags
soaks &'a.5:?3§F..§C3'f1Aie'»§§'¢§3'33;'§; %_'i'5"§I'$ :.)azsjoouaauus_}a-
eu§99'é.1,fg§}'ideas;-"f:o§.i69.a§ma… uaazorwam saauoaaa-on
zoag;6a5'i:'a.§3u baud asses. 2.-.'a*a_".o..-a.maa.ac! mu;
a..t%'.o.wa.-gs}'wa_'c5oag:s–gsauco. sow; 59.533305; sow
uauq.}csga:uoo'aVV_b;ic. a'3ej'ei44-aiov.:a.u .-sasisau aiognv W5 fisuopiuo
uaoaq %%ap;.nua%+.m%.gaoanaaa Kitfldiiflidg 195- aw. ass:-an
*~"1;f"*i'4;t3F'5~*~"~"AA._3~'5°°?"*3' _. '
f %i3_,a,°"¢ta ma. : mas am, zoos, aorswaau,
._ %k*§£m;¢{'%',%%%%;-955-2004
auaaarrm saoduo, 1983:: am 19 a3a3o_;vacb 7,
1) (a5) :s.;aoia:§~ f_n..o3..Iaf:>u’§vo’ 13(2):: .-was hofit ‘
ea’raaso3a’ an. no-a_-:Iuo.:a.d, e’~’m5§ad”35Qz;Inif ms -maogsfiuu
* 5663304 3134 aiagoddavasoaa. z.j3,.t.a.mua auadw momma
auaagsoa mrus oéaaeaoauusg $031813! agremi 3»-ocsga:
dam aogdsu tunoioaua-)4 arawal 8.e,au..t!s-
-‘q_Q,\~\ou;_’K___
:I..uoa.x:dna- V-‘ –
-12.–
..¢…
wuowaom, am-was a-mags ma: (anersda,
aoa.:os,’n aqua; sauna) aoauaqnw, T1957 u aouqw
14 — a a,’aaa- 54¢ no-6-:wwa..d, aassaaJaoqsnwa3.~sM’_*~V_Vv
aaopsaa 666 % aqua; mm adzdefiodussuq ada;–~
flaw’ “um,
W’?Wi*;,T%=*m*’?”§
augag oa’nc!.v’§’5?«;’.D:fi I9..:”; ‘
_ ‘V .-.ia..A=
. ” 3&5;-ear.-is
T . ;ia_ai€:si».:s- L saoq_..rcIaF
” -‘
2&4? I ~
1- fiaazeci-.,Vd~!:§3’éei*i5(«i%1:1_J, _$:J?(‘9§?3H ‘*?.33F’. %a’aF-I6 –
– wag fioqaqéj ” – ‘
2 – ,_< e:.;a,1 asswnw ) sane-as,
M eonv.:§cs.:%* % % j J_ '
3_- sod, 9956.6 523,,
.. 5°"¢J3W …;. 05$!' .. . .
4 I V-‘-‘v9~’ao9«5?5 ._ 9¢i$é~o :2 – ” ._
5_.;€;:aa’a*;g aas zf’aa.,§;aa~;o ea; a’*aoa.xuarA,K apaaaF°¢-
,6’ asa*3jm:ts».;, pa; saoaarcsaroauao aas_. aaea.»-mar,
_:~-__ms’*ss”j::.::ex§:i”‘;aoa..x’::aroauasa ea; amaoauzuu :
n9_.- maxi an-sag = asauaao mhmsru-9
55*3’3 f?°35 ‘ .. -«
3 «’:’ga”r1jas_, I was :53, –
,Leu.,~q;;;_
fiII.IJIDIIJ
C3’1.R.P.]311.O’1′
6. it 73 perfixmnt to note that as of now the
this arm-.r has: mt been challenged by amrone
mux.:1*11aa.s Laka}’u.1:tha. In the ix1atan1_:.e:m_saa,.
111111: abseet. the ma}: court 1:111»;
afareaafrd ofimnes punishable %
aectimn ‘1’ cat’ the: of on
2?.m.2nm=. A3 raga;-d whether
aanc:ti:ar1 wcuufl ofiemm.
the mid Pflim as long as
Serctiam 19} would be a
1″‘3Qun~§’ ‘It Paint which requires
E1ElhE!l”£5a.’tE
Caunael for the paflfiomr-amused
petifinner continues to be a public
fi*~’.’:”va1 5 . “s::n1’m auflwrity far the Pfiat ha holda
guess he awa.1ted’ gin;-lg the penb 11 between
11;; 13.3.2111? and 26.6.2007 to 15.11.2007 and
‘ past. ::If Deputy Registrar of C11:-flperative So-ck ‘
1~1e11-1,. 1111111113 aflagad ta have tam-1 abumi and ease um
aubsequexlt posts to. which he is appnirmetl i.e., Secretary,
n I-uirurnun VI
C11.R.P. 1322.07
Malaprabha Co-operative Sugar Ltd, the
Appointing Authority is same
Authority is also the same. As
authority is Govemmentiiand ‘this
petitioner has not * to
another. He to” in
respect of is only one. As
such he subniitsp on -the date of taking
under section 19 of
was mandatory. He too
one judéinent rendered by the Hon’ble
in zoom) sec. 1, pnlmh
State of Punjab as Others. In the
it it is held section 19 is time and oifenoe
— But however contends that petitioner herein
to be a public servant in the same cateogry and
” vv.t.Aas he has not ceased to hold the ofiice where the alleged
offence was committed and as such sanction is a must. In
the said judgment at page 19 it is observed by the Hon’ble
Supreme Court, (M \
-. n-.– n.-nun.-cu.nno’o.:|.l|.I III. I\Il\fiF\ IJ£\’
C’.-r1.R.P.1311.D?
‘”‘IT1:a~r=¢fam: it unquastionably follszswa that than
aa:11cieéo:1 to prcmwute can be g’me:11 by
mt.atlmr’i1:_1.r campetent to remrsve the
aerimnt from the ofine which he has misusa::l:”arA A M
afbuaeai because that authority
me 1:: know whether there
car abuse of the ofim by aarvant ”
mt same rank outsider” V’ ‘ ”
8. 3-ancfinzfing all
the thme stages Le. when the
ofice 2:? the Soc1e11es’ ‘ ,
Behaum, he: was made to
campufimofifigi. mid also tin subsequent
peatiig as }ma::m”‘ – Co-operative Sugar
I:’f E.!2:’tE3I’:5’n’>>§}1.IIC§.;, autkritjr of the Secretary to
such the Sccrefary to Guvernmmt
ta 1=:.n.nw Whefllfil’ there has been a
1v::3:1Vsu:a=.vs:”}i’:s3?.$;3§1;t’s.é,¥: :31′ came»: by the petitioner. Th: qumtion
Va;-:.-:c:11~;:a4_.A authuriqr about the fact of
«fir abuse naf ofim does not arms’ in the present
C’:rLE.P.131:2.D’?
9′ PI. is further absawed in page 22 cf the agid
j that, ‘
“”1″1’1era;-.f¢:r1′<'¢. uP0n E trun construtxlziofl
smmn :3 it is inlplicit tlmrein that aa11sr:tie:sn.:£:gf:"'~::
t':1a-at competent authority
zvaczessary whfizh is contpeteut = n
p"-uzhiirz: a-e_1:'ma.1:1't from the
affifi to have been
an-rrupi. mntive and
irusendad ta be -launclmi
I3: gnaw EC-9" observed by
the: Hmms j ;
‘The % protects ail ma
:.I;r}}n5:1}i i.hépiihli-i:”»:§jt:3ira1§§t to perform in the
mmrciae Véf. that: of the Go’u1errLma1:1t.
‘ “fa~rV____1;§:1*1k-h thqr arc parformed
‘V acts from ‘ ‘ prosecutinn.
” ia an cxcaption. Where a
perfntnzm-::1 undecr flne color of
a.n2;£i~.::£if;3? bu1: in reality is for the public
own pleasure or benefit then such
ahnafl nut be protected under the docI:n’ne
V __E:rfStamm1m’ umty’ .”
‘£”.=”:ae Hurfble Suprenne Cuurt has distinguished
sermon 19’? :::afC.r.P.C. and Section 19 of the Prevention of
«4d3.w»uLLL__
CTLBLP. 1311.13?
Cur*ru§etin::a11 fact. 011131 in cams Wwrh attracts Seac.1’_§l’7′
Cr.P.C mhmr of duty would get attracted but in
under m=.ct.ie::»n:a 1r, 13{1} and (2) of Prewntjon of
Act, aex:r!£:’::n 19 autumafically applia.
ID. ‘§’3’h:a.=:: Earned C-uunsel ap§u§.ari:;1gA.:’i%1r
suhnfittwxl that as on the riate of
2’.-‘~’.1.2am*, the p-Eztitinner ofifluvhjch
was allwgrszd ts have been oflbnce
was mmnazed ‘dim cf taking
szzswma. ‘ nee an Wailzing.
A3 such :55 by the Supreme
Caurt as -rfiftxrfisd Praicaah Smh Badal’s
case ‘-»’:a’§isss ‘ under action 19 cf the
11’; relied upon paragraph 39
siateéi %
AA am this question about the non-
of mind; in the auction or absence
3:»? fiamatinn is ccnoartled, thia has been
H*1’Izfi¥5*rEI”¢fi M ‘ch: firat question, i.c., Wham the
péflhlifl asrvant baa csaaed to be a public
5.'{=*.I”!.”&.t1t aims’: he has ceaaeed to hold the oflim:
C’.rLR.P. 1312.0?
KS
*«t;~:é”:.~r3.-r.:’: the allcagasad afienuc is supposed to have:
place, the athers qumtian really
mesacademh .” ” V
Tma u»;sa::ua:2;.r is the Head; Rots-A ofthegaia % _ Y
12. E1 the baa}-g1’au11d of the
case, 2. pmmfial of secfion tiiew $1′
Corrugmtiann. Act, which _ _ Vv A A ‘
“fimwiflmmndim the
=–:’m1¢ aef 19?.3{2 M1974).-
zfai: m ‘-43: r;4rc3,’§r péésed by a
gr ‘é11:.=n-«ed by a
£:.v.:1ih3I”t. 51’ V
V vor revision on
the nr any error,
ar:1ias%u3:2:ltL’__’nr_ xfi’reg1_ 1’aa:’r:”_;Zt3’«* ifl, the sancfinn
u;nag¢%.mbgmnu;, unk-:-as in the
c.-.f..;t11a1 a fiailure of justice has
themby;”
It that under of special court should not
with except far the reason stated in the
A’ ;.i::m. in the pix 111: case the aanc1:i::n.11g’ autlmrity
tr: acxznrd sanction as such the same analogy
W-SE F;-.ss”-as ‘am has app-3% as: regards the accused is
-JULl.»\.c..:_v\____
CrLR.P.I312.U7
19
m-ncemmd and that: special «mutt. calmot substitute the
aafisfaszfzinn cf 1′.h:E sanctiuliing authority.
14-. Here in the imtam case, a peculiar
has arhexi. Thin ia met a cast: wherein this court
tn pr’c:Lt»=:-s into the or the abaemze ‘
any errant in that order of aanction.
agency mgnplied far sanction .
remseé’ tn acamfl aamnzion an the
prmecufixug agenzy has of the
said cmzlcr. The refusal c-f
sarmfiszn 5.3. ‘m-_:tian1J:1g’ autlmrity for
acm-rd1′:1g again came to be
mvugai: _; pm, auggh range: order has reached finality
not bcaen challenged till now by the
A’bae11c:e of sanction and want of
aancticii’ 312; txfia fiiflhrent ‘manna. But hem is a case
*if’=.’:t_.§e ‘ um” authority afier app11<m' 1:11:11 of mud'
113$ 'AA1*g:§f"§zié.ed tn aoccsrd 3.:-nlctirzin, net once but tzuvice. As
E have already held, as bug as section 19 7m on
the stamm boa}: sancticn is a must. and in the instant
case 3:5 the sa authority has 1-efL1'sed to accord
flL4.Q.ur\£nJ-IKL,
CI!.R.P. 1322 .07
sanction I hold that the order passed by trial court is
an apparent error.
15. Further, even in the of
State of sum, reportedizin ‘it ‘4a,_’t’:1jé I-Ion’b1e
Supreme Court ,3 19 of
the Prevention. of Section 197 of
Cr.P.C. has and course of duty
get where section 197 of
regards section 19, it is
“thus factual aspects are of lime
not thereby giving a clear indication
_ _V S tinder section 19 is a must in respect of
it gpbffencesiipnnishable under sections 7, 13(1) and 13(2) of
–
Thus, the findings of the trial court that as the
Vvispetitioner was on compulsory Waiting as on the date of
taking of cognizance on 27. 1.2007 as such he was not at
all a public servant is an apparent error and the same is
liable to be set aside. Hence, in View of the
circumstances narrated above, I hold that the order dated
}’LQ,\.uu:&uL\J.L__
I lthll I I..I|||.n-Ls. lull.-In
‘Z’1’LRl”.]322.U7
13.*9.2-IE3? ymaaaci by the Spe>cia1Judge. Belgaum, in Spl.
Cage E»’a’s:;=., Ci£’.?.No.12f2DD’? ‘3 liable to be set aaiie. ‘
Court. pmchidad mm taking cognizame a
aancléan mrder arfl in the
sanmmning autl1oritg.r has refused to
E wauld be served to caiifiinge %
the trial mm. As afichz hm no
powam us take mgzmw we in so flax-
as the. ggfiitxixzxxm” of taking
mgmr” 166: as %s§§ aside and the
accused. is aimmj %%eé1cf¢mJgfi’e::cr;s%1eve1nad agams’ t h1m’ .
. sd/-é