The Divisional Controller Nwkrtc vs Ramesh Gigali on 26 August, 2008

“”” ‘ “””‘””‘ “”‘ “”””””””””‘”””‘ “‘*’-“‘1’ ‘vA”A-n”.-U._I:Il ur EAIINAIAIEA HIUH LUUKI U!’ IKAKNAIAKA HIGH. COUK1 U!’ KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT Of’ KARNATAKA §’IlGI”! C

E5-9.3 ‘.!”°§-FE ‘E’~§”}{i;”E-§ {Z!’.’.?£3R’E’ SF }\ZP;?.?§R’1?3kKiTi. 3351″” Efi.2Sil3}3sLGF’.E
.”£i.§5k’z”‘EL’ ‘T’E-Elf: ‘EVE-{E 254.2133 343;? £31? RBGGET EGGS

EEFflRE

$53 E$fi’3aE ER.Jfl$?I£E Aflkfifi 3$3AaEnnw~-fg ‘x

figaeallaaeaus first Apea1.§c,2§;0iR§§§f3§f =4

¢ aimnal fimatzmller
%.E.K$HQ?.$a, EIE Eivi3i$g g

E.?ha Maaagimg fliféctfif v#”*–‘
REERTE, Eelgamm, V 1 } 3

Eegta by Chief %aw,3§Ei$e:U _.gV
§.¥.KgR§?.C. * ‘=””*. “q; :,;AP3ELLa:Ts

(fiy”fixigH.§§as§fi§a;’Afiv¢é§ta)

35% 1

fiamesh fiigaii, 3§ yfia:3;_f
Gaszfigiasaa in Ayfiéré-Téxtilas
_§itu¥ai1i fiaw Extwnsiafi
= $§a& §%ér again §3g駔

‘§ava§s:a:a+_. * …BB8POlDElT
‘._§ay §£ig3;?{aavasindda1ah, Afimncata)

~a»s~§~a~

..?§i5*ép§aal :3 fiéafi mnfier Section 1?3{1§ mf

“%£ifif_?$%i£lé$ Act sgaigat tha jufigment anfi awand

*._§at§g g3.1;.2§$4 gasgaé in E,§}C.fi0.13$fQ3 an the

»filé af 1} fifiditieaal Qivi: Judg9{3r.Dn3

A”~£$tar Aazidant Eiaima Tribunal, Bavanagaxa,

awaréing cwmpemsatisn cf Rs.§?,§fi§f«

5

…–……-unm-. ru\.7r! s..umu ur BHKNHIAKR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH (

a

Ea ?ha ammmnt in ésgafiit is ta be ramittafi

ts §§% fribunai far tfie benefit af tha claimant.

kalbfm.