High Court Kerala High Court

Mary Stephen vs State Of Kerala on 15 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
Mary Stephen vs State Of Kerala on 15 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 16088 of 2009(E)



1. MARY STEPHEN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :15/02/2010

 O R D E R
                          C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J.

                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                   W.P. (C) No. 16088 OF 2009
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
            Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010

                              J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is a rank holder in the supplementary list

for Latin Catholic Community published by the Public Service

Commission on 5.12.2007 for appointment to the post of Lower

Division Typist in various departments pursuant to the notification

dated 31.12.2005. This writ petition has been filed mainly with the

prayer to issue a writ of mandamus commanding the first

respondent to report the existing vacancies in the post of L.D.

Typist in Kottayam District within the time from to be fixed by this

court, essentially, for the purpose of enabling advice and

appointment from Ext.P2 ranked list wherein petitioner’s name is

included.

2. A statement has been filed in the writ petition by the 4th

respondent. It is evident from the said statement as also from

Ext.P3 dated 23.6.2009 that the main list exhausted on 28.3.2009.

As per the said statement the vacancies available in the post of LD

Typist up to 28.3.2009 were reported and Public Service

Commission have effected advice against the reported vacancies.

The 2nd and 3rd respondents have filed an affidavit in this Writ

Petition and it is stated therin that the main list published on

WPC.16088 of 2009
: 2 :

5.12.2007 had exhausted on 28.3.2009. It is further stated

therein that a fresh notification was issued by the Commission

and the remaining reported vacancies could be filled up only

from the ranked list to be drawn pursuant to the said

notification. The petitioner did not dispute the factum of

exhaustion of the main list on 28.3.2009. A supplementary list

cannot outlive the main list. It is a settled position as per the

decision reported in Nair Service Society Vs. District

Officer, Kerala Public Service Commission (2003(3)KLT

1126)SC.

In the circumstances the petitioner is not entitled to the

relief sought for in the writ petition for the purpose of seeking

advice and appointment from Ext.P2 rank list. As noticed

herein before, vacancies existing in various departments

which were reported to the Commission after the exhaustion

of the main list could only be filled up from a subsequently

drawn ranked list.

The Writ Petition is therefore, dismissed.

Sd/-

                                   (C.T. RAVIKUMAR, JUDGE)

jma              //true copy//
                                        P.A. To Judge