High Court Kerala High Court

N.Saly vs The Villge Officer on 15 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
N.Saly vs The Villge Officer on 15 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 4131 of 2010(N)


1. N.SALY, S/O.K.M.RAGHAVAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE VILLGE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE THASILDAR,

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.R.VINOD

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

 Dated :15/02/2010

 O R D E R
               T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
               =====================================
                     W.P(C) No.4131 of 2010
           ===========================================
           Dated this the 15th day of February, 2010
           ============================================


                        J U D G M E N T

The prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd

respondent to effect the mutation of the land comprised in

Re.Sy.No.297/2 of Kakkanad village in the name of the

petitioner.

2. Ext.P1 is the true copy of the sale deed of the

property, purchased by the petitioner. Ext.P2 is the copy of

application submitted before the 2nd respondent for effecting

mutation. He was given a reply by Ext.P3, stating that there is

an attachment as per the order in I.A.1013/97 in O.S.No.53/97

of the Sub Court, Ernakulam, and hence the mutation cannot

be effected till the order is withdrawn

3. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Ext.P4 claim

application before the Sub Court, Ernakulam to lift the

attachment. It is the case of the petitioner that the counsel for

the opposite parties in the suit submitted that, there is no

attachment as far as the property of the petitioner is

concerned in the said case. A copy of the encumbrance

W.P(C) No.4131 of 2010
-2-

certificate for the period from 1/1/1993 to 15/10/2008 has also

been produced herein as Ext.P5. Thereafter, the petitioner

filed a fresh representation as per Ext.P6 and failing to get

any reply, this writ petition has been filed.

4. The learned Government Pleader on getting

instructions from the 2nd respondent submitted that, if the

petitioner produces the certified copies of the orders of the

Civil Court and the relevant documents before the Village

Officer, appropriate action will be taken in the matter.

Therefore, if the petitioner makes available the certified

copies of the orders of the Civil Court, along with the

documents relied upon, appropriate action will be taken for

effecting mutation by the 1st and 2nd respondents within a

period of one month, from the date of receipt of a copy of this

Judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
JUDGE
nl