Central Information Commission Judgements

Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma vs Ministry Of Labour And Employment on 1 September, 2010

Central Information Commission
Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma vs Ministry Of Labour And Employment on 1 September, 2010
                              CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                                  Club Building (Near Post Office)
                                Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067
                                       Tel: +91-11-26161796

                                                                   Decision No. CIC/DS/C/2010/000250/SG/9193
                                                                     Complaint No. CIC/DS/C/2010/000250/SG

Complainant                                     :        Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma
                                                         Lawer's Chamber No. 134
                                                         District Courts, Bhiwani (Haryana)

Respondent                                      :        Central Public Information Officer
                                                         Regional Provident Commissioner-II
                                                         Employees Provident Fund Organisation
                                                         Sub-Regional Office, Ganga Palace Complex
                                                         Subhash Road, Rohtak, Haryana-124001

Facts

arising from the Complaint:

Mr. Rajesh Kalasha had filed a RTI application with the PIO, EPFO, Regional Office,
Faridabad on 16/09/2009 asking for certain information. However on not having received the
information within the mandated time, the Complainant filed a complaint under Section 18 of the
RTI Act with the Commission. On this basis, the Commission issued a notice to the PIO, EPFO,
Regional Office, Faridabad, Haryana on 31/05/2010 with a direction to provide the information to
the Complainant and further sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within the
mandated time.

The Commission received a letter dated 24/06/2010 of the CPIO/RPFC-II, EPFO, Sub-
Regional Office, Rohtak, Haryana wherein it has been stated that information has been provided to
the Complainant vide a letter dated 08/10/2009, the same being resent vide another letter dated
18/01/2010. Copy of the said communications were also enclosed therein.

Decision:

The Complaint is disposed off.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Shailesh Gandhi
Information Commissioner
01/09/2010

(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(SP)