Mr Mahendra Kumar Singhi vs Srivari Metal Works (P) Ltd on 29 July, 2009

0
121
Karnataka High Court
Mr Mahendra Kumar Singhi vs Srivari Metal Works (P) Ltd on 29 July, 2009
Author: Subhash B.Adi
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 2973 DAY OF JULY 2009

BEFORE

THE HOBVBLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B.AI) I._ - "..,_

cmmzm. Pmmox 30.40961 " '%   I:    

BETWEEN:

';'"'i's'. Mahendra Kmnar Singbi,

S/o Pxithvizaj Singhi,

Aged 44 years,

Proprietor,

M] S Singhi Metal,

No. 104, Money Point,

K.H.Road, .    "  j' V  " "
Bangalore - 560 027.   _   g ".g;v%.Pi3TI'FIONER

(By Sn'.Vcnkatcsh R..Bhagaa4;¥.:iv.)'~   " V 

1 S1iva1i"'l\{!etaI Wr3s:is 
E514, SIDCU V. Phasé;
 'A  A ..... ..«
, a 1'Rep:es€11it=ti by Sri. G.vic1ya Babu,

  2  $:i.G.'V2i§:E3_'§{Babu.

'Hagar,' -. 
Managing Director,
.A T Metal Works (P) Ltd.,
" V V 13:14, 311300 VPhase,
 *-Hcsut ---- 635 126.
 Tamil Nadu,

H '   Smt. Vinoéha Vidya Balm.

W/or G.Vidya. Baku,
Eircctor,

Srivari Metal Works (P? Ltd.,
13-14, SIDCO V Phase,



Hosur -- 635 126.
Tamil Nadu. .. RESPONDENTS

(By Sri.H.Udaya Kumar & A-ssts., Advs.)

This Criminal Petition is filed under Secm;i .4S£?§j

praying to quash the order dt.2G.9.2{)06 byiize
ACMM., Bangalore in C.C.No.5063/05 and
No.5063/O5 on the file of the XIXV~JAddl-.ClV£&M._:,. _i5a:n_1ga’}care f

allowing the above Criminal Petition.

This Petiticn coming on

made the following:


V ;Z:eQ_.. I.§   l 
Petitioner    ._em1er dated 20"'

September 2006:” Oiigfhe Bangalore in
j

2. dismissed the complaint on the

the — ccznplainant remained absent. He

elespite giving sufiicient time. the complainant has

“He also xeferred. to earlier application I am

_u1xder “= 309 of Cr.P.C. and has observed that the

‘ ix’ is not interested in pI’%t1tIng’ the matter and in

tJ_;rii:§ tw£:g;é&3It:i. be invoked the provisions of Section 256 of C1”. RC.

‘and; ordered that the examination-in~chief of PW4 as not

‘A ‘ “Submitted for cross~exan:u’nation.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits PW-1

had gone to Rajasthan and in this regard. ‘the

petitioner’s Counsel had sought for two weeks’ ”

three occasions, petitioner remain’ and abastnp héu ‘ f n

will get the paint’ :3 present for cms§:;«:cxam:–._’_ fin

date of hearing.

Considering the ;::.~;d_ tfie Icarned
Counsel for the mspondengéé, The order
dated 20th sepgemfi,-gr XIII Addl.C.M.M.,
Bangalore aside. The matter is
remitted ~:o%’%m§; proceed with the cross\
cxaminatioyx ~ is directed to appear before the

4. ~ the pgitifiogjer –bv::___p;r;scnt for cross-examination.

Sd/-u
Judge

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *