M/S. Ashapura Minechem Limited vs State Of Kerala on 1 June, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 13885 of 2009(E)


1. M/S. ASHAPURA MINECHEM LIMITED,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,

4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

6. KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

7. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD,

8. FR. LEBERIN YESU.R, S/O. Y. YESUDAS,

9. JOSEPH GOMEZ @ THIRUMUDI JOSE,

10. ANIL ANDREWS, S/O. ANDREWS,

11. MARY VALSALA, W/O. JOHN,

12. FRANKLIN J. PEREIARAH,

13. JOB JOSEPH @ PALLAN JOB,

14. JOTHISH, S/O. JOB JOSEPH @ PALLAN JOB,

15. ANISH, S/O. JOB JOSEPH @ PALLAN JOB,

16. ALBERT FERNADEZ, S/O. STELEIN FERNADEZ,

17. KOCHANI @ NEVA JOHN, S/O. JOSEPH,

18. ANEESH, S/O. AUGUSTIAN FERNADEZ,

19. GERLIL, D/O. BENJAMIN PEREIAHRAH,

20. FRANKLIN GOMEZ, PUTHUVALPURAYIDOM,

21. MARY VIOLET, W/O. FRANKLIN GOMEZ,

22. ALOCYOUS, S/O. ALEX FERNADEZ,

23. GRACY ALOCIUZ, W/O. ALOCIUZ,

24. BABYCHAN, THYVILAKAM HOUSE,

25. FRISCA KURISAPPAN,

26. THOMAS FRANCIS @ BABYCHEN,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.RAMAKUMAR (SR.)

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN

 Dated :01/06/2009

 O R D E R
               P.R.RAMAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ.

                     -------------------------------

                     W.P.(C) No. 13885 of 2009

                     -------------------------------

                   Dated this the 1st June, 2009

                           J U D G M E N T

Raman, J.

Upon instructions, the learned Government Pleader

appearing for the State submits that law and order situation has

been take care of by deploying two Armed police personnel, a

control room has also been opened, and there are no untoward

incident reported or noticed in the recent past. Police are thus

active and all necessary protection is being afforded to the

petitioner. That being the situation, we do not think further

orders are necessary in this matter. Accordingly, the writ

petition is closed, reserving the right of the petitioner to approach

this Court, when occasion arises.

P.R.RAMAN, JUDGE

P.BHAVADASAN , JUDGE.

nj.