M/S Blaze Enterprises Pvt Ltd vs Nil on 4 November, 2009

IN1}HEHHHiCOURT(HPKARNATAKAJMFBANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 04"' DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDl_).YL

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 256 OF 2003" T    r.- A' 

COMPANY PETITION N0. 5 OF 1933. ,_ _  '

BETWEEN:

M/S. BLAZE ENTERPRISES PVT, LTD. (1N'I_,IQN.},
REPRESENTED BY OFFICIAL L1QUI.DATOR,  .
HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA, V' 
CORPORATE BI-IAVAN, 12% FL()OR,____ "  
RAHEJA TOWERS, NO.26--2'?';..M.G..V'ROAD;  ._ " "
BANGALORE-560 001.   ; ; V.    APPLICANT.

(SR1. DEEPAK & SRI._V. JAYARAM,  RoR'Oj;--)

1 NIL - V * _     RESPONDENT.
THIS C013/;I'£'ANYAPI7L1CA'HON IS FILED UNDER SECTION
462 OI?;THE COMRANIES ACT, E956 READ mm RULES 11(1)}

"3 AND 298 OR THE COMRANIES (COURT) RULES, 1956 PRAYINO
 AFPOINfF'A1\lJXLIDITOR TO AUDIT THE ACCOUNTS OF THE

OFEfIC'I_AI}"E§QIJ11§ATOR FOR THE HALF YEAR ENDING 31-03»
2009 AND RISK' HIS REMUNERATION AND TO PASS ORDERS AS

'REGARDS REQUIREMENT OF SECTION 462{E'>) OF TI~IE

H " "   ' CjC)MPAN1ESQAC'i', 1956.

M



 

THIS CA COMING ON FOR ORDERS. THIS DAY THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

 

O R D E R

Auditofs report is accepted and his
terms of the order dated p..afiase:cj”
No.21 1/2007. The requiremgnt

of the Companies Act, 1956 is§’V(“i.£V§pensetii~x’2x?iti<;;i
Company applicafioiq – _

Ln