<1 I .- 'I :j "
_.__ __._ ---. -I A 411
N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKR A §i\Nl'.'§Ai.ORl§
mun mus um 26"' on or nmzcfl. 20-as k
BEFORE
me HON'BLE_ MR. JUSTICE N.K.:éA"nL« L
1_I_r1wp ma:-rrrnzm N,- n,.1_ao57 or ~ = "
BETWEEN:
mus HOTEL MAYURA _
BC)ARt'.'IiNG Aisifi i..O'IJGifiG 'OFF '€'G,_
New BUS swan. 3*.' ms PR9? ~ 1 V .
SR! munk Mn. SANGAPPA. AQED-A- . :=
visa! II-n-sun---
4.5 YEARS; OCC: BUSINESS, RIO. BIDAR vv
TALUK AND DIST BIDAR' _ H " ' J
AND :
1 '|_'HE 9g_REc}'"roR--, DEéA§eTfitsaENT,6F.fouR:sM
GOVERNMENT cu': __ '-
i5-T FLGGR, 'F' 'ELGGK * 'V ..
cauvaav s=..Le.---=.~.*.¢.e.~..'
an ran.»-;r.»
-an nu.-w
, BANGAt§)RE;'
2 V" THE CHIEF E$1e:.I§IE5R (ELECTRIC)
% -ICORFGEATIGN _:-muniwsj
Gasrzc-am.
TAtUK';%%«'D fi%'%"jG_' "
-. --...}a---.--.. .-p- .n-'- ii-up-. r-1-n 1-: ran
-- TH: -Jumps fig: cfiuiwuun cm,
a 1 ' - ._ GESCOM BEDAR o 3. M DIVISION
V. Ema '~ 4.,
T. T#..U%{ a'~'knD Dis... BEDAH
' V A M A ~ " 'rH1=; ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELE
Q .3-. puvasugu
1:14.. 0' mm' F x-_,N_ AT BANGALORE W.P.Nd.18057I2006
vvu-v --
BIDAR TALUK AND DIST BIDAR
..¢.-_-n-r Aqua :2: nnnunnnzn A Lm .
{Ey um I. north mJwtnnwn\:|;niI'v'InT n\.aG
SR] : N K GUPTA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO 4)
TH!-S wR!T PHiT!0!\! !-3 F" F" "MD"? fl 'DMD V"? Di'
u----u- -ru -my-u -s I var .: v.-1..-_v an-an
THE CONSTWUTION OF |NDiA PRAYINC': _T0, CALLV-FOR. THE RECQRDS
FROM THE RESPONDENTS PERTAININQ 'TO THE . CASE; OF THE
PETITIONER AND TO OUASH THE IMPIJGNED NOTICE DT. 7.2.2006
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE C AND iM9UGNED’NQTlCE DT.
‘i7.1t12f)0l3 PRDDUCDD AS ANNEXUi?E- F BOTH i{3SUED~. BY THE R4.
THES ‘v’v’RiT PETETEGN C”‘\..v:v1″iu”u’;’s3.p i-iE:’\Ri”G iii
5…
‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, COURAT_Mfi_DE |f’~OLLOWiN{?-:”
or otherwise
of the impugfiod’ February 2006 hearing
n
V I-l’I|G_Bf I-rltsanaunlu-I I-ran. III Inexulw ‘.0’
_is;9_3Qn Aggggn it 2 Amn_m A.-. …-. n
1-‘i’V’Vénci’aiootize impugihéci”hotica dated 17*’ October 2ooe
ham ‘.1f:it.o7;t3E$B0MIBDRIAEEEISA-IiIO6lO7l526O-63
Vida AoneguroT~w’F;. both issued by respondent No.4, has
E _ll-‘Ill I-I IE! I I5 III’ II F
H H ifistgn \urH- net;-t§eg\’_
T Petitioner in this petition is a Hotei represented
proprietor for boarding and Lodging. The
/
/:.’::_._
mag COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No. 1805712006
REsPoNo£Ni?3V.’:’ ”
grie.anee ef pe.itionsr in the i…….n. petition is
the first respondent in order to encourage ..
extended certain incentives and concessions__?i:iii§;|ud.iVno’
electricity supply tariff to the pmonerenarei
.h.e.e!s. According-igr, they have iss-.2ed*–the evceflete; ”
stating that. petitioner is
concession for a period oi:seven~ttie serne has
been communicated by Assistant
vide Annexure:” to the shock
and surtsrise ” petitioner received a
oommun_icatiuotn”i=:’Aei:ruary 2006 communicating
I
-|I:nII:|!-u 9″ , and
fi’ ‘IS fill ZI&Z é VXI #3.’ X??? TI UK
17′” January 2005. the tourism
‘ tariff’ given to petitioner is withdrawn and
oiaiined at Rs.70,364l- in respect of
ii
A “ri::.’3’_’;’:..1″i:~._i_gj”‘.4g_iv-ii: frinrn F hninru 9
I . Ila! Iull I’ lit IIIJIII IJIJUUIHI’ In
In it was stated therein that, the detaiied statement
A
/in
/__
IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l8057I1006
;
IN THE HIGH. C-UB.’I’ DE KARNATAKA AT BANGALQTTQ fly ,E.[\_lo,1fl§ZI;9__Q§
4
along with the reference letter copies were enclosed and
aiso char”-ed …e tariff HT–2e to HT-2&3 and
-1′ ”
requested the petitioner to arrange to pay a Var: ii”
Rs.70,364I– within thirty days oittenuisietiie
Power supply would be discon”°j°ted;w..Ai’-.V_A.’ Pétfifher ”
e csr..ing!y deposit-.. the said amount under._prot’est”=asW
notified in the communio*’ti_on, on i9″ 2G”u6A ‘side
Annexure E. Be that as it rnay[_ V
3. Again, issued the
eommunie-,i:ion_ Vida Annexure
_’11
l
E?
6:’:
if
5!.
..I
U
U
I
8
s?
E
5
‘3’
in
Tourism tariff” to petitioner was
Zywithdrairirti. ‘cia_i_med a sum of Rs.3,51,704l- and
aisneh’anged:_thetariff HT2A to HT–2B and requested the
-_ In-.u–‘–w :1
‘ “‘r~.Vv’»pet.’tiensri .e_p”5v sum of R235’! ‘.7C_I4.I- from January
to January 2664 within thirty dye ofierwie the
insteiiefion power supply of petitioner would be
In reply to the said notice dated 17″‘
r ” rs covet GP I.:Ai=.:~e.’r..i<.n. . .1' …A.NGA._D1LE w.p.no.1aosmooa
O
C
3
3
9.
-<
§
0.
3
5
§
U’
2
8
8
s.
9..
CI
>
3
3
.’ as
:55
n ‘h’I’il’\l’\£lr and hnnrnrm-I annual nnnaarlnn nr
P Ir3Iol’ll I “I l\5 IT?’ I lg’? WWW. iywil II I” INJU
respondents. V
R Mlhnn in mm’. 4 ‘hat! ‘”:.-A n I In far nrnliminnru
\’ I II I’3I I I.’ ‘I5: I”?-I’|’£’T S I WTFC H3.’ IWI ‘Ir’ I “I ‘CUII 3”’ ‘3’ J
hearing” 213′ fiesgrfitbef 2006. this Court had granted
surd and above the amount aiready
1.!’-.re4..=.~ week… in rnnn…-t tn’ the
—tr! -to
demand and directed the respondent to
_rI.=.»2-itetre the pewer cenneetien ‘:9 the pejtiener and t
—-v
I
_______.____
“‘f”E con”? 0:: K.AP.N:’xTAKA AT *9.-..1-.~=s.=..4.:..o:=u=-.. w 9 Na :s.:e5’1I2.r.r»;-
i V = nertifioate vid
1″.’
u
k..ep rt serviced s- Eong as …e p……oner cormnuee tL’~.._
pay the current charges for the suppiy.
6. .A.fter careful e.a! tion
on record and the stand taken by rosponoionts ‘1 In that
the tourism poiicy, petitioner isouafii ‘ a
Certificate, granting power _a_ period
titionéffi Vliiisiiapproved
__.t
t ta iosuéci Vida ietter dated
-3
9*” June policy 1997-2002,
atitair letter dated 20*” June 2001. If that is
Acese,’pet:t=onsr ougut to have aumnifiao’ a
roori’osentation before the first respondent seeking to
I! T FKARN T I,?_nA.NGALOllEW.P.No.l8D57f2OD6
. ‘. -…..w.:’—…– _ _————- –
the competent authority granting power tariff concession
for a period of seven years by their letter dated 20″” June.
*’II\.f’hI F. . .-
LUU I. l’UI IJIUI,
33-‘
communication dated 17′”” October Vida
F, petitioner has filed a detailed reply eetee_2e”‘iceteeeri
2006 vide Annexure G and the
nan” nr nnnueir-Inrar-I nnr +a|rre’$n~.Vnnn:” nlniuiainn” -:I’\ {ha uecannn
II?”-I ‘WI NJ’-1′ IWIVJWI WY II’-II l§I\gII I’. ‘J?’-5′ ].\Jv’.”I ‘Lf ‘II’? 3? II?-
Keeping the objections demand
notice in abeyanciadaiair notta_king.j_”an§’deeision on the
same is taking into
c_nsider_-io_n all the bone fide ahown
by petitioner the conditionai interim
order by it would auffice for this Court,
and .eee%eeee of justice and also safeguard the
e»…1_J.interes~.t.of’ , if appropriate direction is issued
‘mm “at; ii’ pl: an en!
. .. H ,_!.p we L: I run? II. uuulunuua Ha
all -use Hun …-.&:H…..-..-
We” 3 ll la “HUI Ial .
{N man COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE W.P.No.l805″iI2006
IN ‘i”‘;3″‘§ fi’;Q’fl _L_,'”‘”LJ”R”f’ OE ‘@,l_\_i’ ‘” ‘5 I33 K4″ T 5 T 34;} “QALQQE W,P,Ho.],§Q5 Zfzflfi
fii _
ds disposed of with the
n
6
7- in mg light cf the Lets an
d_.
:2
:3
3
in
rated abcv ,
following dirccticnc:
CI
nu:
directed to consider the cbjecticns ifiicd
pctiticncr dated 28″‘ 0ctc……r *.::’§¢.”*’c«_
Afifi’ifi.iFé 6’ ‘no’ ” Snprnpdcfe in
accordance with icw_ and cffict Acgmciicciic
ccncassicni—-wcs;ficcdéciwv. tad; pcfificncf by first
fhn gain: 3
V..flW’T “Ila, H
mspcndcizt ‘cad
*””t’cf’-iy as pua.4′”ffi-+’–r’bi’c, “:1? any rate,
“5-V sci Vvtcutiflwccks from the date of
_:’-gg,-;s;nt” ‘ .;r_’.e_- .g_!h:§::.
mrlwa It
such a dccisicn is taken by
” ” 5fci.’:.rthL racgcndent, fcmth mspcndent henein
c’i’rcc’r’c’ rrf f’
petition flied by patfiioncr ”
I-L
I
I
I
‘-1
E
‘I
I
I
5
I
I
#76 insioiiafion of petitioner:
III] Further, petitioner is ‘ an
submit his detailed mpmsantation harming -[ V o i
first respondent in the ii@t»i,L’:!’..__1′!2aA’,”‘a*.J_iI.éL’i:z;9r t.£_=..r”:”:V’$€
Cfififiuafilulf C nmu
t’
Vida their letter dated .Jt§rne{_ 1?; oiairning
concession, wiihin a date
of receipt i
J’ – rat’ …-.-.-.-2: ….re.”.’: is
directed to roe:-oiito gomg and ,=r.m.=.-…_
apptogviato “cider in oocordanoe with law, after
j” ” __ afifiidiog on to petitioner and
‘ dispose, same, within a period of four
i the date of receipt of
reoresontoiion from petitioner.
Sdf-
Judge
E ‘ Ti ‘ T 0? KARNATAKA AT’ WING