High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Mukhtiar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 19 February, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mukhtiar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 19 February, 2009
Criminal Revision No.404 of 2002 (O&M)            1

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH

                         Criminal Revision No.404 of 2002 (O&M)
                         Date of Decision      19.02.2009


Mukhtiar Singh
                                                  ...... petitioner
                         VERSUS

State of Punjab
                                                  ...... Respondent


CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL

Present:    None for the petitioner.

            Ms.Simsi Dhir, A.A.G., Punjab,
            for the respondent-State.

                         *****

A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL):

Vide judgment dated 16.02.1999, Judicial Magistrate Ist Class,

Kapurthala, convicted the accused-petitioner (herein referred as ‘the

petitioner’) under Section 279, 338, 427 of Indian Penal Code and

sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months which was

upheld by Additional Sessions Judge, Kapurthala, vide his judgment dated

31.01.2002, hence this petition.

The allegations against the petitioner are that on 16.04.1998,

the petitioner while driving bus No.PB-11K-2984 rashly and negligently,

imperilled human life and caused injuries to Inderpal Singh.

Sufficient evidence has been placed on record in order to

establish the charge against the petitioner. Evidence, as led by the

prosecution, is without any blemish and the findings of fact, having suffered

from any defect, do not call for any interference. Faced with the situation,
Criminal Revision No.404 of 2002 (O&M) 2

learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for some leniency in the

quantum of sentence.

Having perused the records of the case, it transpires that the

offence was committed in the year 1998. The petitioner appears to have

suffered much agony of trial due to the protracted proceedings which

remained pending for about 11 years. He has already undergone about 4

months imprisonment out of total sentence. There is nothing to show that

he ever repeated the offence.

Under these circumstances, this petition is dismissed with the

modification in the sentence that he is ordered to be released on probation

on furnishing personal bond to the tune of Rs.10,000/- with one surety in

the like amount to keep peace and be of good behaviour for a period of one

year, failing to comply with the terms of bond, he would be ready to serve

remaining part of sentence. The petitioner is also ordered to pay

Rs.20,000/- on account of compensation to the injured Inderpal Singh,

failing which this petition shall be treated as dismissed in toto.

Copy of the order be sent to the Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Kapurthala, for compliance.

February 19, 2009                                   (A.N.JINDAL)
mamta-II                                               JUDGE