High Court Karnataka High Court

N Pradeep Kumar Koushik vs The National Insurance Co Ltd on 27 May, 2009

Karnataka High Court
N Pradeep Kumar Koushik vs The National Insurance Co Ltd on 27 May, 2009
Author: V.Jagannathan

E
3:

E
g
E
§
§
3
7%
§
§
3
:

E
:

§
§
E
i
5
§
§
§
3
3
J
E

«W mmxawcewwaswmm-up mnmwwoeat vmvwuramu vmu uma-n!m31’war’V:ur’§It\M”K

_ 2 ..

ALLOWHCG TI-IE CIAIM PETITION FOR C03iPEN&ATI<3N AND
QEEKRIG ENHANOELILENT OF C()1ifl'EN8A'I'1ON.

THIS M.F.A come on FOR Imwma, m:s fnA¥,
mm ccrum’ nanxvamnnm mLwwme:– . h

JUDGM§fiE C

‘I’h:: eompezmation “3’ = -‘
in queatéan by the appeliant has

failed to award mum’

2. V.Sa.stri fir the
q@MmHfi@fi%flQfi®m£§Mwmmmmmmum:
&mw&mm§§g@@uw%mmmammamum
queatu’§g1 fits’ austaincd the appellant,

the b1.z5i% was he was the
Teohnicym. Refs:-ringto the inmncne tax

E-i1 befme flm ‘iribtznal as per EJLP112, it is

the Trx’}mm:I wuld have awm-em
44 theaba-we had.

3.Dnfl:1eothe:rhand,1aa.rmdCm.n:ae1Sha’i

U M.U..Poonaoha for the inaurame atmxparzy submitted that

theappeIlant&sfailad’£:3pIa.cead%tzeavid:en:cein

J
4

3
§
4
2
3
§
m
§
§-w
at
3
Q
U
E
§
x
§
%
Z
a
§
a.

‘:3
§
§
3%
2.5

§
3
Z
3
é
a.

59

§
9
:3
Q

§
E
§
§
3
2
g
E
L:

3

E
3
_;,
g m,
2
S
E
E
E
E

wk 3 ….

prmffiflwbssflkwememnaequentupmflwifiuriea
susmmabymmamamdgmwnyausmedbymmagui

as such. no amount can be avxrarzied uncle.-.r rm A’ %

4. Though the appellam has

evfimm to show as ta what
dispute that the appcnagfc as,%n?§es.Ap&oprxet§r ar%[ Eart
right mgr; has theme is
apoaure of §:’m._ thhh and rigm
saraarm thigh and 1-sgm

fore: arm.

5. inta accuuxt, I me that theme

made by the learrwd Coumal

that tlm appellant may not be able to

% t;ri’ V%’ :busin¢sa en:ec1:ive1y an he was daring mum-
mztumt, the appellam has he be mmpemated.

A towards ma cf fzxmre earxfmg capacity, in 1211::
% of the appellant placing evidence the

mama! has sufiiemd by him. it in rmsonabie ta: mica the
itzazxsm at Rs.3,GGO[- per month and cfaability at 3.3%

y

I, 9

2
§
La
2
2
§
E
3
§

::~mAe”‘<«m'cz.m'ma"'maar'IiazVsa'–w; ans wwmwwwn» mu:-mmuvm-nun-awn-5 annwnn ww'wu\m warm nwwamnwmnrinwwm am

._ J: ..

and apptying the nmltipliw 91′ ‘I5′, the appellant win have
in be awarded I-za.7o,m(– under unis

Comequecntly, the: mmpenaatisan amaaunt
by Ra.’?’C3,2%}’~ which amaum; will alga :§t”: .,

6%.

Tk award is

appealinpart.