High Court Karnataka High Court

Yeshwantpura Consumer … vs The Joint Director on 27 May, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Yeshwantpura Consumer … vs The Joint Director on 27 May, 2009
Author: N.K.Patil
 

Hfififl fiififlfié

5 WWW {W %LfiMNI%"%"gf'&K& REQH fiflgfi?  mfiwamm Wfiflifi amwér" 0? %fi%Ng&f%'§'i;?;;,z_§»:;,-33% Hfififi QQWW £3? &&%NflsTAKA WGH CQURV 0? K&flM&Tfi§5=i'.¢»':a:k

IR THE HIGH COURT GP' KARNATAKA AT 

mmn Tms TI-E 27m DAY 9? MAY 2oG?._f    =. x

BEFORE  A  
'mm I-IC)H'BLE 1vm..msncEj%h.x;9s:m;  

w.p.No.13:m;2oo9 {c:sak-- 1=n1s} % 1 % 

BETWEEN:

Yeahwantpura Comurner _
Co--operative Society, V  -_
H0395, T91 (3 Grass,      
K N Exmnnitmn, TI'i\;6I1iRtZ'£*...£'1, .   ' "
 12, Reprgsfexzfiad Z,   
by its Sacratazy;-.,vSr:;i;._K1::na:r,   '

a/odate.  J  A %

. . J

{By srivai-u .x&ai§¢aze) %

AND:

 1.

,..§:A”I’V1:1taJoizit’DVi1Vw’e::ct§>r,

A ” Civ’ii”3upph’ea am.

I3nrac’ tar,

x T Aciai: 0®eofFood anti
V Supplim and
flcxrtheirn B&visir:uz1,
Vfimlikaval.

20. .. RE3PC)NDEHTS

(By ‘Sri Hf!’ Haren:irapzmaa&, HCGB

Thia Writ Patitifin ia filad m:1€Im’ Artkzlcs W6 and
22′? of the Cionafihrticn :3? India, praying to dhwt the

,. J;-V~’a'”§’I:”§§fi£%%£%@ WQM QTZQMJH

wwwwx “$.33” E%«f”%M£%&W¥§’§§*m£’=’- .1:

?&
Q
PM
$
3
§
L}
i
Q
E
3
§
Q
X
3
§
is
3
E
3
3
3
E
Q
E
5
S
Q
E
E
g
‘:2
§
E7
3
E
§
Q
E
K
§
§
§
X
§
§
._ V
§
3
3

rmpontiant Nani to axmsédm the repreacratatalon d,ated–“=..
17.3.2009 vish Annexum-C bcfiom the mew c9.rd.a
distributed far Na:-th Rang shop Vyafikval, — ‘2
dated 1.4.2009 Vida z to the 1% nmpowentvgt. ”

tltm <=a.t'fie:st.

11:33 was-. Petitima mm1ng’ an an-J %§.m.m} 7

bsarirgttnia day,tbaCmn1mad&pTthefoIin*wltt1g A’

2. Tm pet£hm’ writ
petitimx of mamanms

* vac Annexxm-C before

as mam-= the
Ldattzzi .-

Z for Nonh Range shops
and mm aaught for dixectian

:11; m fimwarci the mpm dam:-3.
* E 159 the 1* respmdent at the

V’ 1% tafjuutim and aiguiityz

V have $16 the lswzwnmi wume1a r the
}’pev.~i::igmr and the mm Grovarnmm may

a far tin reapondmn.

/ Wmfl

4. The only grievm cfthe petifioner in tha iisatant

writ petitinn is that petitioner has :3

am is neither mu’
amt the report «sf the 1″
respontiemz in wnsidam the
* by the
pe1i5mIm’. mu; ocftha 2nd

mpomient, _ pmmted thh writ

af thc rsaprwanization dated
by the petitzinner m the admmm
‘ 5 rwtjzlsfiflablc. ‘I’1mefore,wi$ho*ut azpmszm

A on the mm of the cam, an Writ Pefifiun
diapmd arm a ciimction tn the mpemm;
mmpamxzt autmtity ta camider tm mpxwnmttfnn

dated 123.2009 ma& by time petitionez vac Ammmv

L

/

mwmwm ma” mwmmmma flififi fifififg?’ mmsmmm Wfififi 50%.??? 0F Wfifi @%%.i%T OF KfiRN&’¥%KR Hififi mam” OF mmmmm i”-ifififi fiflfifi

reprmenmmn on 17.3.2009 to the
of Extzise Super’m:heMent for
to 1:113 new map oemtructsaj.

zwwwam war”

zsmm wwmwma 3w§”” fiwmiwmfimmm mmvm mwwm wr amnnmmwmu. 1-man uwuna am” Rflflwfllflfifl mikzfi mmwm QM MSQM mum’

C and dispose cm’ the same as expeditieusly as pogiaible,
at any rate within four weeks from the date

tlrlin arder. Further, tm 25*

fiorward the report dated fl1é_:1″i’

within one: Week from t’t1¢_da;fis <$f—-;¥§¢ecipt 9;:
With than aha-e1"wa't5arm§ 1-.;¢."";'g§:§ V

dispmcd ofli

'I'k1eIe€t1fi :%Im¢aa¢¢¢g perrrlitted to
file mew gtif within two

Sd/~.

% ‘ 3[F a”‘. Judge

VjEgm §j’f