High Court Rajasthan High Court

Naresh Kumar Sharma &Ors vs State Of Raj And Ors on 15 December, 2009

Rajasthan High Court
Naresh Kumar Sharma &Ors vs State Of Raj And Ors on 15 December, 2009
    

 
 
 

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JAIPUR BENCH

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13718/08
Naresh Kumar Sharma & Ors. 
Versus 
State & Ors.
DATE OF ORDER     :      15/12/2009
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

Mr. Rajendra Soni, for petitioners
Mr. S.N. Kumawat, AAG, for respondents 

***

All the petitioners applied for appointment to the posts of Teachers (Primary & Upper Primary School) duly advertised vide notification dt.30/10/2006 under Rajasthan Panchayatiraj Rules, 1996 (Rules, 1996) and in the Teachers (Primary & Upper Primary School) competitive Examination, 2006, they participated in process of selection initiated by respondent-RPSC; and were finally found to be suitable but were not appointed against number of vacancies available and advertised by the PSC.

Grievance of petitioners is that despite vacancies duly advertised being available with the respondents, and their names also find place in the order of merit, but still have not been considered for appointment.

Counsel submits that issue raised in instant petition has been examined by this Court vide judgment dt.01/12/09 in CWP-4728/2008 & (6) others (Naveen Kr. Sharma & Ors. Vs. State & Ors) whereby it has been directed ad infra:

Consequently, all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider candidature of petitioners for appointment on the post of Teacher (Primary & Upper Primary Schools) on the basis of their selection made pursuant to advertisement dt.30/10/06 strictly in order of merit as per statement (supra) against available vacancies other than reserved for TSP area; and in case either of petitioners does not find place in order of merit in respective category for appointment, respondents shall inform each of them about his placement and reasons for which he could not be held eligible for appointment. Compliance be made within two months. No order as to costs.

In the light of what has been observed (supra) in CWP-4728/08, this writ petition also stands disposed of. No order as to costs.

[AJAY RASTOGI], J.

FRBOHRA13718CW08 15-12.doc