High Court Kerala High Court

Saleena vs National Insurance Co.Ltd. on 15 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Saleena vs National Insurance Co.Ltd. on 15 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36163 of 2009(M)


1. SALEENA, W/O.ABDUL JABBAR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., MANJERI.
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :15/12/2009

 O R D E R
                          S. SIRI JAGAN, J
               ................................................
                  W.P(C) No. 36163 of 2009
               .................................................
        Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009

                          J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is one of the claimants in O.P.(M.V.) No. 534

of 2006 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Tirur. The

O.P. was filed by the legal heirs seeking compensation for death

of the 1st petitioner’s husband in a motor accident.

Compensation has been awarded by Ext.P1 award. The balance

amounts due after releasing a portion of the same to the

claimants was directed to be kept in fixed deposit as per the

award. The amount now in deposit is Rs.5,34,175/-. The

petitioner filed an application before the Tribunal for release of

the amount for the purpose of the marriage of the petitioner.

The Tribunal rejected the same by Ext.P6 order, wherein it has

been held that already an amount of Rs.2 lakhs has been

released in addition to the initial amount of Rs.30,000/-. The

reason stated by the petitioner that she wants to purchase gold

ornaments, which not find favour with the Tribunal. The

petitioner challenges Ext.P6 order.

2. According to the petitioner, it is customary that at least

W.P(C) No. 36163 of 2009 -2-

40 sovereigns of gold should be given to the petitioner, for which

the large amounts are necessary. After hearing the counsel for

the petitioner and perusing Ext.P6, I do not find any infirmity in

the said order. However, taking a lenient view, I direct the

Tribunal to release Rs.1 lakhs from out of the deposit.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

sd/-

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE
rhs

// True copy //

PA to Judge