Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Naresh vs State on 21 November, 2011
Author: Z.K.Saiyed,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/14861/2011	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 14861 of 2011
 

 
=========================================================

 

NARESH
@ NARIYO CHHAGANBHAI SOLANKI - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MRBHUNESHCRUPERA
for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MS KRINA CALLA, APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE Z.K.SAIYED
		
	

 

Date
: 21/11/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

The
applicant has filed this application for regular bail, under
Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in connection with
the offence being CR No. I – 170 of 2011 registered with
Isanpur Police Station, Ahmedabad (City), for the offence u/ss. 394
and 114 of I.P. Code.

Heard
learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP for the
respondent. Learned Advocate, appearing for the applicant has
contended that the applicant is falsely implicated in the alleged
offence. He has contended that the applicant is arrested on the
ground of suspicious and he is not named in the FIR. He has
contended that from the bare reading of FIR the applicant is shown
as abettor. Therefore, looking to the facts of the case the
applicant may be released on bail by imposing suitable conditions.
Learned APP has vehemently opposed this application.

Having
heard the learned Advocate for the parties and looking to the facts
of the case and the fact that now the charge-sheet is filed and,
therefore, without entering into the merits of the case, I am
inclined to grant this application. Both the parties do not press
for reasoned order.

Considering
the above, this Application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to
be released on bail in connection with CR No. I – 170 of 2011
registered with Isanpur Police Station, Ahmedabad, for the offences
alleged against him in this application on his executing a Bond of
Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one solvent surety of
the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject
to the conditions that he shall-

a) not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;

b) not
to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or
complainant in any manner;

c) maintain
law and order and should cooperate the Investigating Officers;

d) not
act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

e) not
leave the State of Gujarat without the prior permission of the
concerned Sessions Judge.

f) furnish
the address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the
time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence
without prior permission of this Court;

g) mark
his presence before the concerned Police Station on 15th
day of every English calender month between 11.00 A.M. and 2.00 P.M.
till the trial against him is completed;

h) surrender
his passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.

5. If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned
Sessions Judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.

6. Bail
before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would
be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the
solvency certificate if prayed for.

7. Rule
is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

(Z.K.SAIYED,J.)

sas

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

107 queries in 0.183 seconds.