Nekrtc vs Ramayya on 22 July, 2009

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF     '

CIRCUIT BENCH, GiE»LBAR(3A"'.v"4"  %

DATED THIS THE 22nd DAS*oié Ji}LY'~?Ofi9  A

 % _ % V
THE HONBLE MR,JUs'£:::;:i 'JAGANNATHQEXN

  

BETWEEN :

N.W.}{.R.T.Q."   »  2   'L ,
Bagalkot; DiV13..$i()'I1;'. Bagafikétg «. A 
By its Di*«'isi*3I_1E?J CEifm--.rdH.6r, 
Repres<:<t1ted_by'j~:fs.__    -- .
Chief Law Officer.'     '  ...APPELLAN'I'

{By Sri.Subi}a.$hv1\.?f:a§M}fi1i;"'»}&dv)

    ..... 

‘R8I:}£VlA€%1_’y’§a’_&v 4 :}’ci manthraya Kalal,

Agfid’-<?Jmut"4.8
R] ()4 Maiiollig 'Sibailapur taluk,

New 3:: r/:3" Brahmapur,
Gpibarga, …RESPONDEN"i'

(k 1y 1sri;§.4.smvasnaran Raddy, Adv)

% W' This M.F.A. is filed u/3.173(1) of M.V.Act praying
"'-ucigainst the juément and award dated 17.1.06 passed

V%.eeappea;.'[:§ axso dismieseti' 'or; the gonna that

Ea)

in MVC No.6/O4 on the file of the PI'l.CiVi1 M

& MACE', Guibarga.

This M.F.A.coming on for tl>ii_s.-} ‘da3z,’V

Court delivered the foilowingf . ‘ -… 2
5_l[1_.IxB(.’r}\!’;’}%3′;i~’I.”§’.:”j4
Submissiozx macie j:fha:é”_e§1:niected appeal
M.F.A.No.768;?.§3S}:_’e’v§:_as :di$fi:1:£$$$ed. this Ceurt on

09.02.2009 f>f delay being not

satisfactorfiiy merits.

2. In view of _{}..1eA”v_a¥i)t3ve submission made, this

the delay is

flat’ p;*§>pe1fi3i_év’e};1:;J;;1i:1ed as well as 911 merits, no mse is

VV V . ‘made by sippellant.

Sd/ –

JUDGE