-A 'S»"
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA.
DATEI)'1'}~1}S THE 218"? DAY OF SEPTEZMBER_.
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR. JUS'1'1c_13SA.J1'1'_J."O--{:_;§1Jzi:;- _ "
M.F.A.N0. 6784 oi%i_2Qc7Ti'(w(§)A..'
BETWEEN:
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE co. L'F'D_.,
REPRESENTED BY V " *
THE DEPUTY MANAGER} ;
MISSION ROAD.
BANGALORE-27, A _
REPRESENTING Nsgzw JNDIA,
ASSURANCE ?_CO;.1}LTD..'.'-- A
BIJAP,UR~_.
{BY SRI: SDDA£1S?:AAAi' ADV.)
A_N..1?* ~
" * _ 41 ' Q :'SANT€-if-C>St--§V """ " "
.. _ S/O.SHD.?AJ1 SHINDHE
_ , ' E2./'Q_ 1§U1?AjwADA
'._:TQ:« MI_RAJ.
" DIS-Ti S¢'xNGLI.
SH).-.';i\/IIQIXO
IQ
A. S/C) Ktsr-IAN AI--{WAi..[j;S.
' SMT. MAT1-AURA
w/O KISI-{AN AH1vA1.1~:.
Aggger MAJOR
R/O S1---tA:~1A1>1s:T.
BEJ.-XPEER
[BY SR3: SAE\}(.}17\.NA('3(L}Efi I")A V. l:.3II{ADAR
APPI:?LLAN'I'
RliSI-'(:)T\?i)ii;\E'E'S
., AIJV. FOR R3]
l\.3
Tnm;MFAis1nLEo:jn33oo)cnruLc.AcTiuyuNsT
THE CHUDER DATED 12/4/07 PASSED _WJN
\VCA§fl{hKl17/O7 (DN 'nis IHLE ov "HIE wguagog
OFHCER AND cowmmsmoNmR FOR _fivoRsMENy
coMPENsNnoN,sUs£nv$KMm2,smApoR,mwAaosK;A'o
CONH¥mfi%fl1ON (H? RSALO7A84/-- "UTE £NTEREST Aiu.'
120/oP.A.ANI)E'l'C... -- 74
'nus zuwmAL cownmo "gon": frfi+hoR§Efis.
'finsDAYJHH2CoURTDEuvERm3THEFouxfiwwofi "*
JUDGfiENTi
Even though "tho 'for orders, with
consent, it is i.;ik<:n inasmuch as.
the subjectfsflswis only having to the
grant of J Hl"2;3/o .
on 9.8.2010 to consider
the«.§ioi1o~i,vi11gVnsuiostantial question of law:--
'.'h Commissioner for Workmcns
having awardeci interest on the
iiaxnizird from one month from the date of award
was in Con.sonanCe with {E16 Judgrncm. of the
Sup1'eme Court. in Hie ("$2138 of i\Eat,io1'1al
,2?/'
{gr if//W/,,--«-9
3
111su1'z:1r1ce Co. 1.101.. Vs. Mubasir Ahmed
{2007--ACJ--845[SC)/(2009) 1 SCC--550."
2. The matter arises in the foilowilig mz~1r1ner:~
Respondents are the claimants who
parents of one Suresh. He met with an
25.9.2006 at about. 11.30 a.m.,
collision between the tempo ancziixa
said accident, the
fatal injuries. Hen(:e’.._a c1a;in=-1.;*pe:,a1;ion filed. The
COIT1p€;I1Sat”iiOIit_ViS {i.ete.rinined on the basis of the income
and the i’e1eVL1_ri’tf “zit Rs.4,0’7,484/~. The only
qiiesxfinn whi£:h”is” so-ugiht to be pressed into service in
§v3.re?3feri’t~eppeeiimttfrom which date interest at i2% is
3..,”ir’1deed, it is to be noticed that the Apex Court in
em~.__ page of PRATAP NARAIN SING}-I 135:0 Vs si-IRIMV/is
AND ANOTHER reported in1~\£R 1976 SCC 222
“has ruled that the e1w2u’d1’r1g of interest. at. the rate of
12% siiall be from 30 days from the ciate <)I'ae£’:’.-»->-“/”I”:–i
4
110%”; from 30 days from the time of award. I e:1.m of the
Vi€W’ that liaving regard to the dE?(.’.iSi()l'”l rmidered by the
Apex Court, the quesi:i<)11 of i1'1i:c:1'fcri11g with t.heV.awz1rci
_passed by the Commissioner does not §1.1*'isé;–4.:"§l'h.e
substantiai question of law is answered aCc'o.I_fding1y. 'A * ii
Appeal dismissed. No other cof1't.'<:.r1i;ic)Iii iS_.v1liI'V§_.§{vf'C11
The amount. in dopiosii,
trarasmitted to the Coxiaiérfied Comimijssiiorier for