High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Ranjeet Tanti vs State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Ranjeet Tanti vs State Of Bihar on 21 September, 2010
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Cr.Misc. No.31644 of 2010
     RANJEET TANTI S/O LATE GHUTU TANTI @ CHOTU TANTI
                            Versus
                      STATE OF BIHAR
                           -----------

2. 21.09.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner

and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted

for the offence under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian

Penal Code.

Considering that the petitioner was nabbed

when he attempted to commit theft for which he is in

custody since 5.3.2010 and the petitioner’s mother

undertakes responsibility for the petitioner’s conduct

after his release from jail custody, let the petitioner

above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be

fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection

with Town P.S. Case No. 110/2010, subject to the

conditions, (i) That one of the bailor will be a close

relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit

giving genealogy as to how he is related with the
2

petitioner and the other bailor shall be the mother of

the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the Court about any change in

address of the petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also

state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other

case of similar nature after his release in the present

case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty

to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

ground of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iv) That the

petitioner will be well represented on each date if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will

be liable to be cancelled.

It has been submitted that there are only 2

other cases pending against the petitioner, which fact

will be verified by the Magistrate before releasing the

petitioner on bail.

Fahad.                            ( Anjana Prakash, J. )