High Court Kerala High Court

Noufal vs The District Collector on 14 August, 2009

Kerala High Court
Noufal vs The District Collector on 14 August, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 22893 of 2009(F)


1. NOUFAL, S/O.MUHAMMED K.P.,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE TAHSILDAR, ERANAD TALUK,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.DEVIDAS.U.K

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI

 Dated :14/08/2009

 O R D E R
                           V.GIRI, J
                         -------------------
                      W.P.(C).22893/2009
                        --------------------
            Dated this the 14th day of August, 2009

                         JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the registered owner of a 1996 Model

Mahindra Jeep bearing registration No.KL-10/E-7652. The

vehicle was seized by the 2nd respondent for the alleged

illicit transportation of river sand. District Collector has

passed final order as per Ext.P2 holding that the vehicle

was liable for confiscation and requiring the petitioner to

pay an amount of Rs.40,000/- towards the River

Management Fund. This has been challenged in the writ

petition.

2. Petitioner is now in possession of the vehicle, same

having been released on interim custody on payment of an

amount of Rs.25,000/-.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

vehicle in question was a 1996 Model vehicle. Therefore,

the value has been fixed at the higher side. It is also

pointed out that only two bags of sand were seized.

W.P.(C).22893/2009
2

Findings in Ext.P2 that the vehicle was indulging in illicit

transportation of river sand only requires to be affirmed.

Admittedly, there was no pass accompanying the vehicle

when it was intercepted.

4. The value of the vehicle has been fixed at an amount

of Rs.40,000/-. This is reasonable. In these circumstances,

I do not find any grounds to interfere with the same as well.

But further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P2 shall be kept in

abeyance for a period of two months from today and if the

petitioner pays the balance amount of Rs.15,000/- within

two months from today, then it shall be treated as due

compliance with Ext.P1.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

V.GIRI,
Judge

mrcs