High Court Karnataka High Court

Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 14 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Office Of The Official Liquidator vs Nil on 14 October, 2008
Author: B.V.Nagarathna


,_ BANG§LORE~560*O3@,

_ 1 _

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNETAKA2flVEAfiGfi1CRE

DATED THIS THE 14*” may or 0C$sBg§ 2ob9*._a,7

BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRs.JUsTicfi’aVv’&A§§RATfimA
c.AfHg¢gggg20Qi;,%

[-1H,fg= ‘*5 u .

£29.a§3;a0.74L%:s;

BETWEEN :’ §f f;’% 7 ‘7~_,

-m..n.–.._………~.n

0FF1cEwQE ?HE’q,.~_V,
OFFICIAL LIQuI:%$oR’y _
HIGH COURT OF KRRNRTAKR ‘
4?” FLOR; p &_§uwINe_*’
KENDR1YA°sADAN. ‘ ” ”

KORAMRNGALA, ”

…APPLICRNT

°2(EzusfiiapEE2éK, ABV.,)

-.–….._.–.-.«

…RESPONfiENT

-2-

THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECZTION
462 OE’ THE’. COMPANIES ACT, 1956 R/W RULE’.S13..’iT(b)
ANS 298 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES”,’–.__”19″56

PRAYING ax) APPOINT Eu: AUDITOR CH3 3mD;T 1gE_
ACCOUNTS <3? 12%: GFFICIA1. LIQUIDATQR=I¥M% THE a
HALF YEAR ENDING 30.9.2007 AND rEIX'_HISuu"

REMUNERATION AND ETC., .»w-_

THIS APPLICATION coMiNGfTdN:*§GR «béb$§s.

THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE_THE1HOLLOWIfi§§H 1
Auditor's re§§fit a¢%é§E§%}_Amfiit$r's fee
is fixed in germs 9: 35¢ §:d§§ dated 8.6.2007

passé§'Qfi QflRfN§;2i;f2QO7.

§,R§qqirémentW.of Section 462(5) of the

'C6mpanies Rot is dispensed with.

u.Abc§fdingly, the application is disposed

Sd/it

bkv Iudé-3