Karnataka High Court
P Abubaker vs The Secretary on 30 May, 2011
Vfw
»1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN.
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY 05* MAY zcyn .. n .;.
PRESENT _ . _
TI-IE I-ION'BLE MR. J.S.KHEHAR, ...msfr:.(:E_
AND - V V "
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICZE I:';GfRém§:E$H
WRIT PETITION No.9598/2010 (GM-V1§((1vI.~$) '
§_E3_T_WE_.}:3_1'_{;
RABUBAKER. S/O MOHAMMED
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. '
No.4/53, am CROSS " '
M.J.NAGAR§ DAM ROAD
HOSPET 583 203 _
KARNATAKA _ V '
REPTD. BY GE:NE:Emj§E;jFOR
8 fr s.R;AN:1_RAI;VHA,_ ACWOCATE}
AND:
1. "mg sECRE'tAfi'¥_ .' _
s':Af:'E: OF 'KARNA'-'I"'APiA
H\f§_DU:'3TI'R}E1S"A1_'§D COMMERCE) DEPARTMENT
V 'fEs'E 'z>:RE€:fr0R OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
*DE1>A_R':3\;:.1¢:N3foF MINES AND GEOLOGY
__Ng;4.9';~scnsr:fH_i.B:.QcK, KHANIJA BHAVAN
. :3,%DE\/*AVRAJ'[;;URs {RACE COURSE] ROAD
' ;BANG.é's.L{fl;{E 580 801
mPU':Y EDIREZCTGR
_DEPs%R'I"'MEN'F GF MINES AND GE:{>L()GY
AA ';::Qs?E':' g,.VP.EspoNDE*:~s'rs
$3?' SR2 R<;,§<:CiA'Ef'E
: mR RE 43.';
mvwmmmvmxmmmwmmmmmmm' _.._, ,
gwwxafix
THIS 'NR1'? PEITITION IS FILED UNDER AR'I"ICLES
227 09* Tee CONS'i'ETU'I"ION 0? ENDEA PRAYENG
SL.NO.8 0;: THE: NOT1fFICA'F1ON er? Auefrfzee-'~....eregeir3g para? the petitioner was also granied a
eeeeiri yard germ}: en ?L1%{}.2.0G§ [Ar::r:ex2;re~E]. Two
eeeejiiéertie weee érieerpcsreieei ir: the perrnii re eséafekleh
,4-
4. It weuld be relevant to mentien, that having
arrived at the eeneiueien, that the stock of iron ere
eteeee at Emmihetii village, $3I}di1§' taluk,
was met genuine, the Deputy Ekireeterg 5 _
Geeiogx", in me first inete:1ce,_};)y are.' N
11.2.2009? eaneefleei the stock yerd
to the petitioner, By the afefe;eaie1--'ere1e1f, {fie }pe.:1'f§ie3ne:~
was also required to Stack
stored in the said steVe'1'gzg;g,re%,_' responded
t0 the the Deputy
Director, in order to
dem0netrete}~V;V{}{eie:A: eiuestion was genuine.
Dieag1;e.ei:'1g depicted in the response
filed at ef._vtfhe'.~'e'petitioner, the impugned order
fifii.Q3.2G'1«O...._.ee,rne to be issued, \?Vh€3I'€b}?', the
}23ej::"et§;--V. Mines $1 Gecfioga Heepet, which
iiriei' a§iee"f:;2i§ified the eueetion of the steel: ef iron ore
(3Q8{)€} ee:1e of iron ore lumps and 70903 iron ore fines}
in the petitienere steel: yaré. It is this aetieng
V. eigainee the petiiienes, eeughi ie be taken threugh the
imgegeeei ewe: eieted 8§3e2§i{} {A::e1ex::re-A}3 ezhieig
bee been eeeefieé by flee peiiiieeer 'eefere thee Ceurt
*5-
55. Based at the principal requirement expressed
during the course of hearing, we are safisfiede that--the
instant writ petitien shouid be disposed of"
direction to the petitioner to furnish Mineral__"D.eie;§é5§ehV_ "e H
Permit obtained by the petitioner"; Hfef'ttjanspo§fiif1_g;: irenynfi
ore from the mine (for \vhiv. 1Fer the aforesaid procedure to be adopted, it
be eper: to the petitioner te fuenish the relevant
Exéiiiieral Diepeieh Fermits ie the Deeuty Bireeter, Mines
end Geeiegy, wifézirz al peried ef {ave i¥€€§:iS.. A fine}
deeieéezs éhereezea éneieefiing She ve§:éi':.:¢ 5}? %;he Eviéréetel
m
~ 1' AAA
impugned order whereby the respondents are seeking to
auctien the Inaterial stored by the petitioner atfiffzeeir
stock yard in Emmmihatti village, Sandur
stand quashed. ” ‘ ‘– H
Dispesed of in the af0resa:idA’ter:ns”._ _ VV 9
ee.ee eeS:::f%
e”C§:Eei §ElS’€i§:é:
REESE
YD. fg.
Index:¥V’7N”e’ – _ AV