P.Ramachandran Nair vs Prince Thomas on 3 April, 2009

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 260 of 2009(E)


1. P.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, AGED 67.S
                      ...  Petitioner
2. MRS. THULASI RAMAMCHANDRAN, AGED 59
3. M.K.RAJAPPAN PILLAI, S/O. N.RAMAN PILLAI
4. P.RAMACHANDRANKURUP, AGED 61
5. B.LEELAMMA, AGED 61, W/O.SHANKARA
6. V.G.CHACKO, AGED 74 S/O.LATE MAMMEN-
7. THOMAS P. JOH, AGED 64 S/O.JOHN

                        Vs



1. PRINCE THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS, NO.1 AKKULAM
                       ...       Respondent

2. BRICE THOMAS, MALAYIL HOUSE, NALANCHIRA,

3. T.G.THOMAS, KOTTATHUR HOUSE,

4. ANNAMMA ALEXANDER, THOTTUMUKKATHU HOUSE

5. SANTAMMA ABRAHAM, PALAMATTAM HOUSE,

6. ELIZABETH GEORGE, MALAYIL HOUSE,

7. BABY SAM, MALAYIL HOUSE, KARAVALOOR P.O.

8. RENU THOMAS, KOTTATHUR HOUSE, PARAKODE,

9. GEORGE VARGHESE,MALAYIL HOUSE,NALANCHIRA

10. SHAJI GEORGE, MALAYIL HOUSE, NALANCHIRA

11. ANSON GEORGE ALEXANDER, THOTTUMUKKATHU

12. THRESYAMMA THOMAS, RESIDING AT KOTTATHUR

13. RENJITH ABRAHAM, PALMATTAM HOUSE,

14. T.G.ALEXANDER, THOTTUMUKKATHU HOUSE,

15. ANCY ALEXANDER, THOTTUMUKKATH HOUSE,

16. SWAPANA GEORGE,MALAYIL HOUSE,NALANCHIRA,

17. ROY ABRAHAM,PALAMUTTAM HOUSE, MULAVANA

18. ANIYAMMA THOMAS, KUTTATHUR HOUSE,

19. MALAYIL BANKERS (REG.NO.739/85 PAZHAYA

20. MALAYIL BANKERS & INVESTORS (REGD.NO.

21. MALAYIL GROUP FUNDS (REGD.NO.3467/96)

22. MALAYIL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES (REGD.NO.

23. MALAYIL GROUP PFINANCE (REGD.NO.3468/96)

24. MALAYIL GROUP FINANCE CONSOLIDATES

25. MALAYIL BANKERS & INVESTMENTS

26. MALAYIL BANKER (HO) REGD NO.2753/86

27. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER DIST.COURT,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH

                For Respondent  :SRI.L.MOHANAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :03/04/2009

 O R D E R

K.T.SANKARAN, J.

——————————————————

W.P.(C) NO. 260 OF 2009 E

——————————————————

Dated this the 3rd April, 2009

JUDGMENT

I.A.No.4850 of 2009 filed in this Writ Petition is an application

seeking permission to withdraw the Writ Petition without prejudice to the

right of the petitioners to file an appeal as provided under Section 79 of

the Kerala Insolvency Act. Learned counsel for the contesting

respondents submits that no appeal will lie. I.A.No.4850 of 2009 is

allowed and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file

an appeal, if it is maintainable.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/